Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Fri, 14 October 2005 16:41 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQScK-0008DY-8P; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:41:12 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQScH-0008DN-Nt for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:41:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA29061 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:41:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQSn1-0003Gu-1S for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:52:16 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2005 09:40:58 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,215,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="352193150:sNHT25032716"
Received: from chappe.cisco.com (chappe.cisco.com [171.71.182.172]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9EGeuJh025370; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chappe.cisco.com (chappe.cisco.com [171.71.182.172]) by chappe.cisco.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9EGerQb015867; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:40:53 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:40:53 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF7552B2.2205%mshore@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510140933060.11081@chappe.cisco.com>
References: <BF7552B2.2205%mshore@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

The visa requirements one would probably prevent us from meeting in the 
US, some will consider this a "feature" :-)

The "restrictions on freedom of expression" is a little more tricky and
one could argue that the IETF should not be in the business of trying to
change policy at that level. China comes to mind as a place we could not
go by this rule, but a lot of people seem to belive that "constructive
engagement" is more successful than boycott.

Singapore is often held up as a place with lots of restrictions and rules, 
but for attending a conference or meeting the rules are frankly "invisible"
for most practical purposes.

This is a slippery slope indeed. Countries that ban crypto....

Should we really go down this path?

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen 
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Academic Research and Technology Initiatives, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Melinda Shore wrote:

> On 10/14/05 11:58 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:
> > - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so
> > stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely difficult for
> > some participant to attend.
> > 
> > - MUST NOT be held in a country with restrictions on freedom of
> > expression, especially if these extend to the blocking of web sites
> > or any other censuring of personal communications.
> > 
> > - MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants would be
> > under pressure to support national technical policies on threat of
> > imprisonment or other punitive actions, for their opinions.
> > 
> > - MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants would need
> > government approval to attend.
> 
> Those are great criteria.  I agree that we need to focus on
> actual impediments to participation rather than personal
> preferences.
> 
> Melinda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf