Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Fri, 14 October 2005 21:17 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQWvE-0005pB-48; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:17:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQWvC-0005nO-5s for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:16:58 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25609 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQX5y-0006dT-EI for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:28:07 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2005 14:16:48 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9ELFxK9028675 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:16:20 -0400
Received: from cisco.com ([161.44.11.166]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:16:20 -0400
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:15:35 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20051014211535.GA4612@sbrim-wxp01>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <BF74AC74.1338C6%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <D15A63B4-D01B-4850-9A6B-E9952FC45E97@acm.org> <1129318772.2260.91.camel@thunk> <9A0A6CD1-0369-482E-8FCA-A656937A951F@acm.org> <43501AF2.9090305@dcrocker.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43501AF2.9090305@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2005 21:16:20.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[85BF2C60:01C5D104]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 01:54:10PM -0700, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote:
> 
> >It certainly makes sense to reword it for a pattern of difficulty or 
> >exclusion.
> 
> and the method of making objective, verifiable assessments that this 
> pattern exists will be...?

Don't even try.  Choose people who listen to you, give them your
requirements and desires, and give them the power to evaluate the
tradeoffs on the behalf of the whole group.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf