IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 26 June 2022 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40365C15948A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKqJaVcB-OZj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021FEC159484 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E245C0113 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:14:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:14:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1656227671; x=1656314071; bh=q g1QaK0PYcK1CFwfCXjsj5H8er9WOFAasfXWRitf/jY=; b=jL3C7OsPLL95PEnrf gi10VDU+PlgGl9DfQH4MiCgbvRpStJ1lvM21vsA4dzQsMvpjqNQV8NrVxme2nniM gZ1yJXmkdQ6foRR0uCfBSbzSN5YXI0bLcrlHpo9y7jiXVAQOuCkuEkTN2fBnUTMo U5GZTg1t4zYMzQWyySvNUXtCesIQFHloTN62kokOqnFOoCrR3ptpOFMGp1IcBETD Jw0DvScHaiK1Ta8lvW8uDRcRzqMM/qg4+3tyPiwKzlwS/5ktHju+EZAVS2SuQUeo fk0cbnZPaCFc8ZKmusj1W9pFnu7dqm87fDGwy+KMHAg4bEhSJq8qMUlzJBqlT2ru 8ufIQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Vge4YgP6CzjUI91qxrtVisY6cEgG1L6coOPdNHLnCRIpiHE8Tcrxsg> <xme:Vge4Ym9BcvxaI5dkR5U4N0RX7hKZXTETHsmEWAHhgyt48p7cZbq64YL-QPhFicqM9 awVNyRUrDt0Mw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Vge4YnTuI694q0mc9jDOXqGPoXZzhPHryoDJP_p1b4XRs9uqWeuhgXaeoxNsWLbeNU6vfQDNAb8Kc1h061oGKSew385z-EVJMdXaa_6BExkgIPBXyuWwhA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudegvddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeikefgue dvgfehteettddvieevgedvuddvfeeufeeifedujeefuddvheduieeinecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifoh hrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Vge4YosrXIr5B_tjo4jh-UI0hNz_4CYhJfDVqj0rPDS4ukfHf3R9cw> <xmx:Vge4YocwxaJRtRGeGuWnSoSLyRwIqnrVrJn8xs2erD9SfHVp8NqizA> <xmx:Vge4Ys2P6cbnxzydcixyPbEcF1IkGks_xs7QgerNDHXwqgHhqpbhQg> <xmx:Vwe4YiqCkjWO9hGsphMrfKy3TgHiCdo83acecVta1UjhLjoPaUmXuA>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <a8431474-ab23-e032-8ec9-5c2f77a40772@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:14:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <ED90C87AEF388AB3BF7CABCF@PSB> <d92b60a6-22a0-1790-2c1d-adf27e95a19d@gmail.com> <2B75E00161A10F5B6A2A3B7D@JcK-HP5>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B75E00161A10F5B6A2A3B7D@JcK-HP5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RbbustfgsmjrGlsXkNXPpmx7CNI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 07:14:41 -0000

On 6/25/22 22:32, John C Klensin wrote:

> The best solution
> will almost always be the responsible AD making a judgment call
> as to whether an additional Last Call is needed and erring on
> the side of doing one when there is doubt.

It's not the "almost always" cases that I'm concerned about, but the 
other cases.

IOW, a statistical argument isn't convincing here.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email