Re: IETF 62

jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Mon, 20 September 2004 12:25 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA26015; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:25:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9NKj-0004nS-72; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:31:54 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9N8J-00042X-HP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:19:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9N6r-0003tb-Qm for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:17:33 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA25645 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx01.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.104]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9ND0-0004fr-8W for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:23:55 -0400
Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx01.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1C9N6K-0003YN-7H for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:17:00 -0400
Received: from cpe0030ab124d2f-cm014500000962.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([24.103.99.32] helo=[10.0.0.9]) by mail.cyberus.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1C9N6I-0004K0-7x; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:16:58 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Ben Crosby <ben.crosby@alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <414E4A91.1010905@eng.monash.edu.au>
References: <19C06709BE3DD54FAC8ADFBBF31C7FF7176654@usdals324.usa.alcatel.com> <414E4A91.1010905@eng.monash.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: jamalopolous
Message-Id: <1095682615.1048.221.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:16:55 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 62
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ben Crosby wrote:
> 

>  Further, as the host of IETF61, we explored at least four possible venues,
>  one of which was Ottawa - too bloody awkward to get to, since there 
> are very few direct flights,

So Mineapolis (the mother of all IETF venues) is less bloodier to get
to? I am shocked. I would claim Ottawa is more accessible, colder,
cheaper and doesnt have wimpy tunnels - which makes it a perfect choice.

cheers,
jamal


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf