IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt).

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Fri, 30 December 2016 16:33 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AB312947B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:33:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSGThaBltRhg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5874B12943D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id CF287879DC; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:33:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:33:40 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt).
Message-ID: <20161230163340.GA46163@shrubbery.net>
References: <049f01d2613f$c5431ef0$4fc95cd0$@tndh.net> <m2o9zv7bh5.wl-randy@psg.com> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1612282213390.18445@sleekfreak.ath.cx> <B137A15F-A5C1-41BE-84B5-A12DF2D5AFFC@virtualized.org> <FE7643B1-28CB-4ABA-AF95-1B831D701E25@frobbit.se> <5FBCC938E3BF3F24CD0B9C42@PSB> <804FC2E1-1141-455A-8E53-33755B732F1A@frobbit.se> <529FEFF25101DE837A8234E1@PSB> <8D87002E-FB28-4CA7-8FB5-EFE3A7C00893@frobbit.se> <m260m169vo.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m260m169vo.wl-randy@psg.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZniFsCHZpUkVwVzNXoeTxr5MOrc>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, "\"Patrik Fältström\"" <paf@frobbit.se>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 16:33:42 -0000

Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:31:39PM +0900, Randy Bush:
> > > Last but not least, one of the most important design choices to make
> > > while deploying IPv6 on the internal network is whether to use SLAAC
> > > [RFC4862], the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
> > > [RFC3315], or a combination thereof.
> > 
> > To be blunt, as long as there is a choice, we will not see large deployment.
> 
> there is no choice.  in all but greenfield, dhcp rules.  and, in the big
> enterprises, exit control is big.

control in address assignment is useful - what MAC receives what - for nearly
all but the most simple network, imo.  how is that done with slaac?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email