Re: multihoming, was IPv10

Octavio Alvarez <octalietf@alvarezp.org> Sat, 31 December 2016 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <octalietf@alvarezp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8031293EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:54:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgoIL4A_Fu1p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobre.alvarezp.com (sobre.alvarezp.com [173.230.155.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E92D126BF7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.73] (201.142.179.1.dsl.dyn.telnor.net [201.142.179.1]) by sobre.alvarezp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF78F614F; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 02:54:38 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: multihoming, was IPv10
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20161230024719.36002.qmail@ary.lan> <7401a840-590e-28c3-2c3f-1e4b46c34e29@gmail.com> <F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B845946D258@newserver.arneill-py.local> <685eee97-795a-6705-52a5-19707d529975@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Octavio Alvarez <octalietf@alvarezp.org>
Message-ID: <a9b31b76-21cc-de14-e217-6916f3677597@alvarezp.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:54:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <685eee97-795a-6705-52a5-19707d529975@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a4-g2naZJI7DVHCFjsSDWR90Eag>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 07:54:41 -0000

On 12/30/2016 02:20 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> I wrote:
> 
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00
> 
> in April 2000 and I know it is stupid to use source routing for
> multihoming.

Is source routing bad in general or is it bad only in multihoming scenarios?

Thanks.