IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Poster sessions

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 11 January 2011 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB83A69CF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:30:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.602, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3P7SI+y3YFyP for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222CC3A69C0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:30:27 -0800 (PST)
X-CheckPoint: {4D2C079B-0-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0B7Wdg7003031; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:32:40 +0200
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:32:39 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:32:38 +0200
Subject: Re: Poster sessions
Thread-Topic: Poster sessions
Thread-Index: AcuxYbk3nKivi+xOSryZVcnErUFx9Q==
Message-ID: <6D992F32-6249-41C8-ADC9-2A85A7EDE138@checkpoint.com>
References: <4D258AB3.9010903@tana.it> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B51@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <tslipy2ndm6.fsf@mit.edu> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B59@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4D26940F.3020404@gmail.com> <AANLkTi=5X=L5C1NJPBRPcwsvWBDfsUA=jhqVTf2RuTr6@mail.gmail.com> <ED6A886C-2FBC-4312-9066-18108363249C@nokia.com> <E0444BE9-83B6-42F9-8B6B-D514F7C1A28D@checkpoint.com> <4D2AE8EC.2060202@ripe.net> <4D2AEC03.8040205@pi.nu> <094C6685-62A8-435C-8467-A77A34A14963@americafree.tv> <17D4AE0F-AB65-4F28-8F99-4105959386CD@cisco.com> <0AEE9B5160EFE527C0EFE27C@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <0AEE9B5160EFE527C0EFE27C@PST.JCK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:30:29 -0000

We can have as high a barrier as necessary to ensure there are no more than, say, 12 posters.

On Jan 11, 2011, at 3:39 AM, John C Klensin wrote:

> +1.  Very strongly.
> 
> Whether the logistics of space and times could be worked out or
> not, poster sessions strike me as a really bad idea and Fred has
> summarized at least most of the reasons.  If we had a high
> barrier to posting I-Ds, it might be different.  But we don't.
> 
>   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email