RE: Poster sessions

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4681A3A6F46 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lFhgTDq8UEVg for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4B83A6F31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:18:04 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAIOyJU2HCzI1/2dsb2JhbACkH3OndQKWBYVMBIRniVmHdg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,285,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="258376971"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2011 15:20:10 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,285,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="578572555"
Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2011 15:20:10 -0500
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.1.90]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:20:10 -0500
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:16:42 -0500
Subject: RE: Poster sessions
Thread-Topic: Poster sessions
Thread-Index: Acutx6GT36DQ2wFqQqWuiGw3WRxyhgAFwCuV
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B59@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <4D258AB3.9010903@tana.it> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B51@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <tslipy2ndm6.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslipy2ndm6.fsf@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:18:05 -0000

________________________________________
From: Sam Hartman [hartmans-ietf@mit.edu]

I think the bar of producing an internet draft is low
enough.  Regardless of what mechanisms we adopt to give people a chance
to try and sell their drafts, I think it is critical that we require the
drafts to be written.
________________________________________

Actually, the bar for writing an I-D is near zero, so it should not be a barrier to presenting
any idea, no matter how half-baked.  A more significant effect is that an I-D is in text form
rather than poster form so it tends to direct the writer to a more thought-through presentation.

But most importantly, an I-D is globally available and globally announced, whereas a poster
session at an IETF meeting would be inherently limited to those physically present, which is biased
toward frequent attendees, those with sponsorship from large organizations, and those from the
developed world.  Historically, the IETF has tried to limit biases in favor of those groups.

Dale