IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Poster sessions

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Tue, 11 January 2011 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F883A6AC6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:46:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4e89rv40aTpa for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7943A6806 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.11.38] (c-76-126-154-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.154.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p0BNmKdU026327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:48:23 -0800
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p0BNmKdU026327
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=triac; t=1294789703; bh=UFXTej+UZ+ZCjcTN80r79J6q/wVf+GGF0yviC9XwR Zo=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=AhB7Qdr4mNqa ddXSaphGZhfXTHwaIDI6bPTxIQRImsYpsESlskhGa3rauc1kXNBcbh4w9lDa5yx4kmD 7x0trEOFonYAyA/b7X14n8xiVs+0dH3WmTa1AdnVcJX0Md5QD45B59nSev20VfExPtO m9fkI9wVp2szfAWOOddIfiazk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: Poster sessions
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <17D4AE0F-AB65-4F28-8F99-4105959386CD@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:48:20 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14CB397B-5B77-44F2-BC89-D46654D2E9AD@cybernothing.org>
References: <4D258AB3.9010903@tana.it> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B51@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <tslipy2ndm6.fsf@mit.edu> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B59@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4D26940F.3020404@gmail.com> <AANLkTi=5X=L5C1NJPBRPcwsvWBDfsUA=jhqVTf2RuTr6@mail.gmail.com> <ED6A886C-2FBC-4312-9066-18108363249C@nokia.com> <E0444BE9-83B6-42F9-8B6B-D514F7C1A28D@checkpoint.com> <4D2AE8EC.2060202@ripe.net> <4D2AEC03.8040205@pi.nu> <094C6685-62A8-435C-8467-A77A34A14963@americafree.tv> <17D4AE0F-AB65-4F28-8F99-4105959386CD@cisco.com>
To: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:46:07 -0000

On Jan 10, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

> I'm envisioning the process and requirements of the poster sessions. In terms of process, today if I post a -00 draft to a working group, I can generally get discussion during the coming IETF meeting. What I think this suggests is that instead I would show a poster at the coming meeting and get working group discussion the meeting following. I'm not sure I like that implication.

Ah, good point.  I'd been imagining that the poster time would be for drafts where there isn't already a WG working on 'em, or /maybe/ where the WG (or the author) feels there's a need for wider participation.

That's what I'd be excited to peruse, anyhow.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email