SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessions
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 11 January 2011 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ED628C26F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6NjChS5h3KZ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBD428C100 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:22:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1294745077; bh=fISHDXBKqwktbNoQWvNJJuIjy/B819iMO1fBJIakju0=; l=1966; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bhT9lkYxA30bSjvOeTc6IgajfGw2mvZxY+9/qMti3+QCr78k2xAWDm9j8od8UHblJ oIyS2I7+tkVVnz2IqDqsuNyo1T4l0WMeDiUax1JfvXtlWzc/YyM2AqRY/3ZeHltoTd tL1jrWLg+YBzXoCKVw5no5qtri3gT4UlBqd6Ldwc=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:24:37 +0100 id 00000000005DC035.000000004D2C3DF5.0000348C
Message-ID: <4D2C3DF5.8020204@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:24:37 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessions
References: <4D258AB3.9010903@tana.it> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B51@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <tslipy2ndm6.fsf@mit.edu> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B59@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4D26940F.3020404@gmail.com> <AANLkTi=5X=L5C1NJPBRPcwsvWBDfsUA=jhqVTf2RuTr6@mail.gmail.com> <ED6A886C-2FBC-4312-9066-18108363249C@nokia.com> <E0444BE9-83B6-42F9-8B6B-D514F7C1A28D@checkpoint.com> <4D2AE8EC.2060202@ripe.net> <4D2AEC03.8040205@pi.nu> <094C6685-62A8-435C-8467-A77A34A14963@americafree.tv> <17D4AE0F-AB65-4F28-8F99-4105959386CD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <17D4AE0F-AB65-4F28-8F99-4105959386CD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:22:26 -0000
On 10/Jan/11 23:38, Fred Baker wrote: > Personally, call me stuck-in-the-mud, but this isn't an academic > conference in which grad students are advertising for a professor > that might be interested in mentoring them or a sponsor might fund > their research. This is an SDO, and internet drafts are what any > other SDO calls "contributions" or "work in progress". I would far > rather have people who ant to talk about something contribute an > internet draft on their topic, and talk with other people about > their ideas - whether on working group lists or other places. For > those of us that *do* participate, it seems to mostly work. OTOH, for those of us who don't participate, it doesn't :-) My ignorance of IETF's inner functioning is so deep that I cannot even tell what is the equivalent of a mentoring professor or a sponsoring organization within the IETF, let alone finding one. As an Internet user, I may have a problem, hypothesize possible causes, and wait for solutions to be proposed or formulate a tentative solution myself. The question is, is the IETF the natural referent of such occurrences? Does the "I" in its name promote it as the universal coordinator for Internet related issues? I think a negative answer would affirm the view of the IETF as an SDO only. This would rise further questions such as who are its customers --possibly the IGF or similar assemblies-- and what kind of mechanisms do they use to order what has to be standardized and how. A positive answer would imply the IETF is something more than an SDO. Possibly the embryo of a technocracy. That would call for more dendritic links to the Internet at large. For example, someone proposed to add more entries and comments to the IETF's Outcomes Wiki. By symmetry, some means to campaign for input topics may also be desirable --not necessarily poster sessions, just something that may motivate outsiders to join the meetings.
- Poster sessions Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Poster sessions Yoav Nir
- Re: Poster sessions Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Poster sessions Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Poster sessions Ed Juskevicius
- Re: Poster sessions David Morris
- RE: Poster sessions Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Poster sessions Sam Hartman
- Re: Poster sessions Salvatore Loreto
- Re: Poster sessions J.D. Falk
- RE: Poster sessions Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Poster sessions Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Poster sessions R. B.
- Fwd: Poster sessions rajesh rajesh
- Re: Poster sessions Lars Eggert
- Re: Poster sessions Yoav Nir
- Re: Poster sessions Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Poster sessions Loa Andersson
- Re: Poster sessions Yoav Nir
- Re: Poster sessions Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Poster sessions Yoav Nir
- Re: Poster sessions Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Poster sessions Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Poster sessions Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Poster sessions Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Poster sessions Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Poster sessions Christian Huitema
- Re: Poster sessions J.D. Falk
- Re: Poster sessions Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Poster sessions Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Poster sessions Fred Baker
- Re: Poster sessions John C Klensin
- Re: Poster sessions Yoav Nir
- Re: Poster sessions Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Poster sessions John C Klensin
- SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessions Alessandro Vesely
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… Eric Burger
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… Ted Ts'o
- RE: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTSI)
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… Randy Presuhn
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… John C Klensin
- Re: Poster sessions Michael StJohns
- Re: Poster sessions J.D. Falk
- Re: Poster sessions Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Poster sessions Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Poster sessions Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessio… jean-michel bernier de portzamparc