Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 01:11 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80471A099F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CqJmeDLtw9Ch for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13771A0909 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28199 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2014 01:11:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=6e26.53604dbb.k1404; bh=5SlKGePi30OJfcXJHlZwLB/uxJJgvmqIIPM/Jn3zKoI=; b=ODV1/g+A16fr94S5RNU40Pqg5IRZv6asy41th5a+NP2N7IlSbxVa5UeKNiikSVPyxgUpbVWMfzdLEomx0meM/lhEXv029gLigjMFm6mTzLcrwegmm7WUW+h/PxV1N/0cWG0GPIz33A3RkuB2HkKq4Vw4d0061wtfR1GOba7h9CLPAzVZr36IKRIMa1YoZ/hdOBC7F9BXu0B2T7y3cvUzaHbCBp9Jp1L1JbggO0C5y9jHwMXKydOcBMdAxic9cOU6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=6e26.53604dbb.k1404; bh=5SlKGePi30OJfcXJHlZwLB/uxJJgvmqIIPM/Jn3zKoI=; b=fuOjloTPIACQHjzSiEcoogO/XnY6h+03gkRHFqn8angwfxpgIXkhZR2ATpK6QeWahvx0Csel7pZfqggHDfzy64us0rUWUqFpX0eN8RAPZuwCbRG+GAY9ldUCQh2xP1tMyxqiAipONokfkrp/BjLKZzVTOwxl2yVbBuPlEAq4DM0UtkiVsqg6wWpfPOQKFKgmoXxe2a0wzF75Nf7/CqStzyi3spkNO4agTrLu2PE5E6fP7cB7cY3EqSyr3AT33bVm
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 30 Apr 2014 01:11:22 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:11:22 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404292103520.2126@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwaNcFHq0bpZaN3FUibo+EK1cRggRqZrtgJbEOKQSG+Evg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140429175606.2856.qmail@joyce.lan> <0A46725A-D80C-4F64-BACE-B2C73A04782D@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaNcFHq0bpZaN3FUibo+EK1cRggRqZrtgJbEOKQSG+Evg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eTNHSRr8M0nKrqIR3nbtkk-Oew0
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 01:11:27 -0000
> In any case, ATPS, TPA, and its variants all run up against a whitelisting > scaling problem. I think that's the more interesting thing to discuss. I completely agree. Dunno if that belongs in ietf-822 or ietf-smtp. It seems to me that the way you scale is to limit the number of whitelists, and leverage the information that large players already have, e.g., the 30,000 mail hosts that Yahoo said they knew they broke. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
- Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Patrik Fältström
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Mark Andrews
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Patrik Fältström
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Dave Crocker
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Dave Crocker
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Måns Nilsson
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? John C Klensin
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Livingood, Jason
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? John Levine
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? S Moonesamy
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? John Levine
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Patrik Fältström
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Hector Santos
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Douglas Otis
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? John R Levine
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Douglas Otis
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Hector Santos
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC? Hector Santos