IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 29 April 2014 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361C31A08D2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCx1MEWV8-P8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1641A08C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4F9A8A9; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:03:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1398776629; bh=OFxf/8PFB6aCVcH5Q3h7eHg4QCoeelHaSmVgQoDvlDg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n/ikq04SdhO+cT+FmcujLxmjxgkjcrQBMxcJTzoRh8xfMpnas1vd3Ymk1H5TeK9GO +NyyZwgAVDqwCpxkxT+1jm/FN7zbfmuZhlf+piSHbM93fHGvdDvseIHxJDoUNB1TVr 7V3i2zUxqmXL23ni/zFcPwY6cZHU+XGTowFGb6FA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA0DA7; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:03:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:03:49 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
In-Reply-To: <20140429124528.GA1324@mx1.yitter.info>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404291502320.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20140429124528.GA1324@mx1.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yeuOKIZmDLBJReVuctqideZByaU
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:03:53 -0000

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:22:31PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> I would really like to see the standards process for this mechanism
>> be stopped
>
> Since it's an ISE stream document and its intended status is
> "Informational", there is no standards process.  (If one thinks, "Yes,
> but everyone treats RFCs as standards," then that's a different
> discussion to the current one.)

I quickly went through 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base/?include_text=1 
which I guess is the draft we're discussing? As far as I can tell, it 
doesn't "inform" about the problem DMARC causes in conjunction with quite 
prevalent mailing list functionality.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email