IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 30 April 2014 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5B21A0948 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JeD5BOTHVJe9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66A1A0290 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so1328611wiv.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UVDpFnmkq//eEs07I76Y5/VRvcseVxMZruKrV0eu2vg=; b=izLzS/V64s7iQY21VKdwh6yl+DifVCDsj1zWui7O7/2d7sfwlYBqMlRHas6ixF9toR txryc5Kp9S4vI62BM5Z9DKdx6IncRnfshFMoD7gImOjeofv7/utxFVlpTc6ybiGMVvgj Xt8vu3Ve3Bl4WjOeMEtbpjLrHnwyCw4XiUXYjGPjsulJJRLqEzZ6ilHY9qRu5VanL6uo 1M+l/uzK2rYilhjKcWcYNTl+YpLqU6DXZdZFDOo443XZwCyEq9o2WcURNpB0RDCdKuJy dh3zhhdMULhwJysfwNsXBBKQWusnFiH5i/GpdyEm5LBy475i3Q92f0TFAgOTuUyWIxzf S0iA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.109.227 with SMTP id hv3mr902216wjb.10.1398816192185; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.210.194 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <535F88C3.4060002@tana.it>
References: <535F88C3.4060002@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:03:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb4r1nqQqe03FwRiTqmcinLE32y84aiq=eX+EG9Newk6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Will mailing lists survive DMARC?
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102ee283dcdb604f837467e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dC6UjGB0pN4fCUMR3uhUznEgemM
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:03:15 -0000

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> The DMARC draft is currently in "AD Followup" state.  A review was
> posted here last week, a process which doesn't seem to affect
> deployment much.
>

The ISE asked me for a revision to correct a couple of IANA things.  That
revision was posted the same day.  My understanding is that it's now just
waiting for its turn ISE's queue.

As I understand it, there's no responsible AD in the ISE stream, except
maybe as an IESG liaison thing.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email