Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt

Yes, Scott, that is correct, sorry for my poor phrasing.

   Brian

On 30/07/2012 17:33, Scott O Bradner wrote:
> 2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents should
> not be published as RFCs  - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work
> in this area
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust
>> we will not be discussing this draft, or
>> draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF.
>>
>> Regards
>>   Brian Carpenter
>>
>> On 30/07/2012 09:26, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>
>>>
>>> 	Title           : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for L3 VPNs
>>> 	Author(s)       : Shankar Raman
>>>                          Balaji Venkat Venkataswami
>>>                          Gaurav Raina
>>>                          Vasan Srini
>>>                          Bhargav Bhikkaji
>>> 	Filename        : draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 12
>>> 	Date            : 2012-07-30
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>   In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label
>>>   Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful
>>>   Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN
>>>   models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned
>>>   methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to
>>>   provision from one single point. More particularly the auto-
>>>   provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling
>>>   between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the
>>>   appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple
>>>   instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in
>>>   the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN
>>>   case.
>>>
>>>   this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined
>>>   labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning
>>>   lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels
>>>   both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single
>>>   point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted
>>>   traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs
>>>   participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect
>>>   provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful
>>>   Intercept mechanism is also outlined.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis
>>>
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00
>>>
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>
> 
> 