Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com> Mon, 30 July 2012 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACDF11E80BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-AIPNW9Dy50 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.250.112]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB3E21F8577 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-910f.meeting.ietf.org ([130.129.9.15]:54630) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>) id 1SvtS4-0000S9-3c for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:08:16 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
From: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <225158E4-78BC-42BC-8339-EB9E0DE75AA7@sobco.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:08:21 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C4BC366A-7A75-40A8-86AB-5C2C2B8262F3@standardstrack.com>
References: <20120730082620.18701.51607.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50164E21.2040904@gmail.com> <225158E4-78BC-42BC-8339-EB9E0DE75AA7@sobco.com>
To: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:08:24 -0000
We seem to be doing a lot of talking about the draft. On Jul 30, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Scott O Bradner wrote: > 2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents should > not be published as RFCs - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work > in this area > > Scott > > On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust >> we will not be discussing this draft, or >> draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF. >> >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter >> >> On 30/07/2012 09:26, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >>> >>> >>> Title : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for L3 VPNs >>> Author(s) : Shankar Raman >>> Balaji Venkat Venkataswami >>> Gaurav Raina >>> Vasan Srini >>> Bhargav Bhikkaji >>> Filename : draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt >>> Pages : 12 >>> Date : 2012-07-30 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label >>> Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful >>> Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN >>> models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned >>> methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to >>> provision from one single point. More particularly the auto- >>> provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling >>> between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the >>> appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple >>> instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in >>> the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN >>> case. >>> >>> this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined >>> labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning >>> lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels >>> both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single >>> point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted >>> traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs >>> participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect >>> provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful >>> Intercept mechanism is also outlined. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00 >>> >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>> >
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Randy Bush
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Scott O Bradner
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Eric Burger
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Randy Bush
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Stephen Farrell
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Glen Zorn
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Martin Rex
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Loa Andersson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Steven Bellovin
- Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercep… Scott O Bradner