Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt

Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Mon, 30 July 2012 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2997B21F860B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIw5f8jT2HMl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4CC21F85AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888CD3551288; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:33:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiDHdgAVwfyD; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [136.248.127.172] (unknown [136.248.127.172]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C0723551276; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50164E21.2040904@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:33:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <225158E4-78BC-42BC-8339-EB9E0DE75AA7@sobco.com>
References: <20120730082620.18701.51607.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50164E21.2040904@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:42:18 -0700
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:34:00 -0000

2804 does not say not to talk about such things - or that such documents should
not be published as RFCs  - 2804 says that the IETF will not do standards work
in this area

Scott

On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Under the long-standing IETF policy defined in RFC 2804, I trust
> we will not be discussing this draft, or
> draft-balaji-l2vpn-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis, in the IETF.
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 30/07/2012 09:26, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> 
>> 
>> 	Title           : Label-based Provider-Provisioned Lawful Intercept for L3 VPNs
>> 	Author(s)       : Shankar Raman
>>                          Balaji Venkat Venkataswami
>>                          Gaurav Raina
>>                          Vasan Srini
>>                          Bhargav Bhikkaji
>> 	Filename        : draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00.txt
>> 	Pages           : 12
>> 	Date            : 2012-07-30
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   In models of Single-AS and inter-provider Multi- Protocol Label
>>   Switching (MPLS) based Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Lawful
>>   Intercept is a key requirement. For example, MPLS-based Layer 3 VPN
>>   models like VPLS and the like do not have any provider provisioned
>>   methods of lawful intercept that are comprehensive, quick and easy to
>>   provision from one single point. More particularly the auto-
>>   provisioning of lawful intercept for all sets of streams travelling
>>   between VPN sites and consequent re-direction of these streams to the
>>   appropriate government network has not been covered without multiple
>>   instances of having to configure the intercept at various points in
>>   the network both in the Single-AS case and the Inter-Provider VPN
>>   case.
>> 
>>   this paper, we propose a technique which uses a set of pre-defined
>>   labels called Lawful Intercept labels and a method for provisioning
>>   lawful intercept amongst the various PE devices using these labels
>>   both in the Single-AS and the inter-provider VPN cases. A single
>>   point of configuration is the key to this idea. The intercepted
>>   traffic is mirrored on a PE or a whole set of PEs or on all the PEs
>>   participating in the VPN. A technique called the Domino-effect
>>   provisioning of these Label-based Provider Provisioned Lawful
>>   Intercept mechanism is also outlined.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-balaji-mpls-lawful-intercept-thru-label-dis-00
>> 
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>