RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Mon, 30 April 2012 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CA621F86C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2XdbNJIThu2K for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C9C21F86C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OEXNHAM70G000QF9@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OENEYWYFI80006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01OEXNH7WAMA0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:24:33 -0700
Subject: RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:09:38 -0400" <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0A8F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <CAHBDyN7SNAyW_Y5bPSq+hNOhw2vzRCSX07idtefE50SWYN1_2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBDyN4eYD7yAEzUaAbDR4J61JKEW44XVM-QVZAXF7zPBpPFDw@mail.gmail.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A0A8F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:26:09 -0000

> > From: Mary Barnes [mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com]
> >
> > Here is an article that does a far better job of explaining the
> > situation than I did:
> > http://www.todaysengineer.org/2011/May/women-in-engineering.asp
> >
> > The largest reason women leave engineering is due to the work
> > environment and perceived lack of support from colleagues.

> Even the summary of the study that is given in the article is a
> fascinating read, with a lot of information on the subject that I've
> never seen before.

> Who would have expected:
>     The study also found that 15 percent of women who earn undergraduate
>     degrees in engineering never entered the profession at all.  Many of
>     them went on to enter the legal or medical professions or other fields
>     where their engineering education served them well.

> The full study is at:
> http://www.studyofwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/NSF_Women-Full-Report-0314.pdf

That link appears to be broken. The link that worked for me is:

  http://studyofwork.com/files/2011/03/NSF_Women-Full-Report-0314.pdf

				Ned