IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-eckert-intarea-flow-metadata-framework-01.txt

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84F411E8224 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ui-GdFe7-NIe for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F95B11E8227 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=342; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374183704; x=1375393304; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=INF2dECWFlrJOlVJ2E/P+X2aTNjOzBPDBlbdiLeGm7U=; b=iUfWoQjaRVLbHn4wqCi99F0T28R+rjD8GrqCiYo/z0FWMaine9zhkcpQ fs2sxRBCZjWXou/tArJ7s45KRH26FugC1j56kFz0nBkCcE6TVTV9pPVkf jV+FytbkJ+i3ST2o70jWVta/t5DyduGdq2PnYdYgAhz+v+OUPfk4cPBp5 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFALxg6FGtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagwaBBcBGgRMWdIIkAQEBAQM6PQISAQgiFAUsERwJAQEEAQ0FCId2Aw+tMg2IXo0jgjsxB4MObgOVdI4QhSaBWYE5gio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,696,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="236694120"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2013 21:41:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6ILfXqU000553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:41:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.56]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:41:33 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-eckert-intarea-flow-metadata-framework-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac6Bn0gbxl2mtmX2RumGmT6rK69PKgB822jgAAhZAoAAAX6WIAAYQm8A///qawA=
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:41:32 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F0604090C8B4D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E848F4.9010003@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [10.86.248.169]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1A7B250955B98848A5D5FC83BE6AE9D5@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-eckert-intarea-flow-metadata-framework-01.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:41:50 -0000

Hi Brian,

Metadata has many uses and not just QoS.

Therefore we believe int-area to be appropriate. What are your thoughts?



On 7/18/13 4:58 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Why is this an intarea topic? To my mind it fits in tsvwg, which is
>currently discussing things like QoS for rtcweb.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email