Re: [Int-dir] Proposed change to review assignment email subject

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBF33A1747 for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPJkw4FTQK_C for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92E53A174E for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id v75so22822606oie.1 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5NHxx87jwEeBl7A0hYw+fh+DrtA8lj6mkqI5N2Cr0+U=; b=UXPnjbuUgdbM+reMMMLomGP8V6wOZ7poqGdk5xrlZX664nyNuyLDZ96M7XDZ840CHI bEjbdNLls2x0CoX+1amP1T/2QkKq1+0SH3kIWAA88sFCx/4+OKfpRYJnwcaFejELRFxS IAs8nsxkA0bdurmImKa1Wsopy0HRbe/ZbjLe84jIbc0q9vDDfsMHzyv3pl2RgpcyA8fI rZtnhLVPe5mAo1MikWZ7MPAnRT04bLBgkfPo0GWBZnH2peScfbHcmvOqInB/GoHyX4kD 9rHMb7moDzSoz6cYecLqycaVG/3aylat6WJDW5sCqRTnY9DNSSsfIfBSBQAUAkh1BR64 Kbdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5NHxx87jwEeBl7A0hYw+fh+DrtA8lj6mkqI5N2Cr0+U=; b=YjzA8S/5glwmWuqHZqvMvDG2ICbmb6IF1DtB7nScYlhIxAfp4sWHNHiYi3IcLkvcau b2TSIoRrcTpx2bimgwGFPejF9Qj6btDdH8Fpegl8gSISGkMeeBSfsEsxXeAbMGKFP7Oe ggHtlF1t1l84UO0UtU55AxcYwbzUefFD6eWR4xX1y/rwQ+PAOykNT0jVT5gPX4JqFieB mJ7caKfnlJfrlagUUFt+AwWty8o9aWMOQO7AAFJq29F3mu80ufh+x243IdPnez0Rpgaw MHvvMWdNRbPoB8+hOtuaVXOIqjhW08nJ1JetTvxkylCt7TjqZhvzcZtClN3ox2Rh2CND GuQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ShLcZ7USzL/dxOOcGzvY7jWAp5cL+umFkrut/lkJ+E62e5bRg Skpq6YKneXdnFeu2j0fQBAKwb9GbZsuN6sA7lH027A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwirK7pGmCz+IdZj/U1RZZZbUcWXNe/D8Jvy3g0kp1b13mRWGBqAuOz2Y4FppYO2y3K0/e2e1mwvbQKuYHpmig=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:308c:b0:2f7:5d2e:1a5e with SMTP id bl12-20020a056808308c00b002f75d2e1a5emr444429oib.209.1648662260758; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CC84AB46-8B73-4042-B873-360C22774992@cisco.com> <4EE390BC-04FC-4263-938D-386ADE5A1CB1@jisc.ac.uk> <a768e222-7417-7426-3c08-cd7a5ebf8cf0@nostrum.com> <CAPt1N1kW7aGqDZXJPu+xmHM0hD40_dyLTHZMfd-70n9Bqy6C_A@mail.gmail.com> <2252b350-3937-96e0-bf76-4bb26fef82ac@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <2252b350-3937-96e0-bf76-4bb26fef82ac@nostrum.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:43:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mvGBrT+R+oG7LjsqiV3tDfz8J8iOvXrtcpbvyayrJqhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000684bf705db7318e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/6WWI_SD7B8nix4BCdhDn-qy7hYQ>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Proposed change to review assignment email subject
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 17:44:27 -0000

Sure, but I would think that we /wouldn't/ want a review notification to
match that rule, right? Otherwise it's going to get filed in the bucket for
the draft and possibly not land on the reviewer's to-do list.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 1:42 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

>
> On 3/30/22 12:29 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> Do notifications to reviewers go in the archive?  If so, why?
>
> Fair point - I'll look to confirm. But even if they don't, I know of users
> that have filters in their own mail processing chains that look for draft
> names in the subject line.
>
> Could we have one for the archive and one for the reviewer?  It seems to
> me that these are two separate functions. I don’t understand the first, but
> don’t object to it. I do object to the second being compromised in favor of
> the first.
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 13:18 Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3/30/22 10:14 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>> > Hmm, I would avoid any instance of the draft name in the subject line.
>>
>> The draft name MUST be on the subject line.
>>
>> Many people search the archives (using mailarchive) for messages related
>> to drafts looking for the draft name in the subject line. The
>> datatracker even assumes this with the searches it provides in the
>> buttons on a document's page.
>>
>> RjS
>>
>> >
>> > Or do we have to say that in git?
>> Do you mean github? If so, then no - participating on lists is fine (but
>> this really should have gone to tools-discuss).
>> >
>> > Tim
>> >
>> >> On 30 Mar 2022, at 07:08, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=
>> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Forwarding Robert's email just in case some filters were too paranoid
>> and dropped it ;-)
>> >>
>> >> -éric
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: OPS-DIR <ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
>> >> Reply to: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
>> >> Date: Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 17:31
>> >> To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <
>> yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "
>> int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <
>> iot-directorate@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "
>> rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "tsv-art@ietf.org" <
>> tsv-art@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "i18ndir@ietf.org" <
>> i18ndir@ietf.org>
>> >> Subject: [OPS-DIR] Proposed change to review assignment email subject
>> >>
>> >>     Please take note of
>> >>     https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/discussions/3760. If the
>> >>     change proposed there will cause problems for you, add a comment
>> there,
>> >>     or reply to tools-discuss@ietf.org to let us know.
>> >>
>> >>     RjS
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Int-dir mailing list
>> >> Int-dir@ietf.org
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-dir mailing list
>> Int-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
>>
>