IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] Proposed change to review assignment email subject

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 March 2022 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6C73A15E7; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoWcTJOSr4F6; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBDF3A159F; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 22UHHx7L013817 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:18:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1648660681; bh=gOoHz4lgVLnWB4Ra1stcVrW27tna5BFF+v797m9vNdM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=jNw42wdVLLbgWnA+76wjS1nd502LkdwBImsiO/gliCQknB8GuaCjyqWpkxTOx6/qZ lwhQhAoKwTZ9nFCMtgNJD5ow7BpVnVIs6zhJbtsB3YdEjgAnnISBhgOlKWxgNNPgdT HBLvOhiXQR3zuJ1al5nogSw4CW6Ge6VuTivdmUW8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Message-ID: <a768e222-7417-7426-3c08-cd7a5ebf8cf0@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:17:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
References: <CC84AB46-8B73-4042-B873-360C22774992@cisco.com> <4EE390BC-04FC-4263-938D-386ADE5A1CB1@jisc.ac.uk>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE390BC-04FC-4263-938D-386ADE5A1CB1@jisc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/VYNVdwMyAbwZADwgfk4ZTzpNPvg>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Proposed change to review assignment email subject
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 17:18:07 -0000

On 3/30/22 10:14 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
> Hmm, I would avoid any instance of the draft name in the subject line.

The draft name MUST be on the subject line.

Many people search the archives (using mailarchive) for messages related 
to drafts looking for the draft name in the subject line. The 
datatracker even assumes this with the searches it provides in the 
buttons on a document's page.

RjS

>
> Or do we have to say that in git?
Do you mean github? If so, then no - participating on lists is fine (but 
this really should have gone to tools-discuss).
>
> Tim
>
>> On 30 Mar 2022, at 07:08, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Forwarding Robert's email just in case some filters were too paranoid and dropped it ;-)
>>
>> -éric
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: OPS-DIR <ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of 	
>> Reply to: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 17:31
>> To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "tsv-art@ietf.org" <tsv-art@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "i18ndir@ietf.org" <i18ndir@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [OPS-DIR] Proposed change to review assignment email subject
>>
>>     Please take note of
>>     https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/discussions/3760. If the
>>     change proposed there will cause problems for you, add a comment there,
>>     or reply to tools-discuss@ietf.org to let us know.
>>
>>     RjS
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-dir mailing list
>> Int-dir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email