Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: milestone on coloring-based loss and delay methodologies

"Alexander Clemm (alex)" <alex@cisco.com> Fri, 15 April 2016 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B1912D796 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTf1WfOI5kop for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BA612B03D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2207; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460746204; x=1461955804; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+IZgjuaxPL9oFrUEOgvNtOxlwR9nVIxOf8Of7CZNleA=; b=gnCuyPeWq5wrtIPr3w2nKUf+VMTJA4j+AL55qxhgC4l6IWTVzWeF5yG/ 0KyAMRJ2IBx/1xDUFDWnyedtm5XZXhF7+T0Y7XBHh9ao8jmgRi/qgKGEM reB3XkFEGPy7UdM3DcVl1yXcsiv5jyEkb9TZZuglOCyQEWZAZLs+YVz9O A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D9AQDzNhFX/5pdJa1dgzhTfQa6LwENgXEehXACgTw4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RBAQEBAwEdHTQQBwQCAQgOAwQBAR8JBzIUCQgCBAESCIgZCA7CMQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAREEimyKFQWYDAGFd4gPgW6ETohcjygBHgEBQoIzgTVsiE0BfQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,488,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="261324938"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2016 18:50:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3FIo35j030602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:50:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:50:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:50:02 -0400
From: "Alexander Clemm (alex)" <alex@cisco.com>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Call for adoption: milestone on coloring-based loss and delay methodologies
Thread-Index: AQHRlxm8aqnIqHWEh0WQKZMUXJzg3J+LVo6w
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:50:02 +0000
Message-ID: <a8ad63596884453a9d98cd76acf7cecb@XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com>
References: <7BB96001-BF28-4C73-8F08-7CD4F96F8C3B@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <7BB96001-BF28-4C73-8F08-7CD4F96F8C3B@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.107.151.80]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/YKUgHIs6leTMBcl4I2m_fj6OH0o>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: milestone on coloring-based loss and delay methodologies
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:50:05 -0000

Support

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Trammell
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 6:21 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption: milestone on coloring-based loss and delay methodologies

Greetings, all,

We're slowly working our way through the queue of things to do after the Buenos Aires meeting; we'll be making a few confirmations of calls for adoption in the coming days. One of the items for the chairs to consider following our face-to-face discussions is what, if anything, the working group wants to do about "coloring"-based hybrid measurement.

On a review of our charter, we find that a milestone on measurement methodologies, largely as described by draft-tempia-ippm-p3m, is covered by Paragraph 4:

> Additional methods will be defined for the composition and calibration 
> of IPPM-defined metrics, as well as active, passive and hybrid 
> measurement methods for these metrics. In addition, the WG encourages 
> work which describes the applicability of metrics and measurement 
> methods, especially to improve understanding of the tradeoffs involved 
> among active, passive, and hybrid methods.

We would therefore like to make a call for adoption of the following milestone:

(date TBD): Submit an Experimental draft on coloring-based hybrid measurement methodologies for loss and delay to the IESG

and for the adoption of draft-tempia-ippm-p3m as the basis for a document meeting this milestone. Please indicate support for or concerns about adoption to the ippm@ietf.org mailing list by Friday 29 April 2016.

Please note the IPR disclosure on draft-tempia-ippm-p3m (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/) when considering this adoption call.

Larger frameworks for the operational collection and use of metrics produced by such methodologies, however, such as described by draft-chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework, do not appear to be covered under the present charter. Therefore, we can make no call for adoption for an appropriate milestone at this time.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian and Bill, as chairs