Re: [ippm] Call for adoption: milestone on coloring-based loss and delay methodologies

[Brian Trammell <[e-mail]>]

Greetings, all,

This call for adoption ended a while ago; in my judgement as co-chair, this document is adopted. I'll add the milestone to the datatracker; authors, please submit draft-ietf-ippm-p3m.

There have been some additional expressions of support for adopting a larger framework document in this space; however, in our judgement this remains out of charter for the moment. We can discuss a possible rechartering in person in Berlin.

Cheers,

Brian


> On 15 Apr 2016, at 15:20, Brian Trammell <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Greetings, all,
> 
> We're slowly working our way through the queue of things to do after the Buenos Aires meeting; we'll be making a few confirmations of calls for adoption in the coming days. One of the items for the chairs to consider following our face-to-face discussions is what, if anything, the working group wants to do about "coloring"-based hybrid measurement.
> 
> On a review of our charter, we find that a milestone on measurement methodologies, largely as described by draft-tempia-ippm-p3m, is covered by Paragraph 4:
> 
>> Additional methods will be defined for the composition and calibration of
>> IPPM-defined metrics, as well as active, passive and hybrid measurement
>> methods for these metrics. In addition, the WG encourages work which
>> describes the applicability of metrics and measurement methods, especially
>> to improve understanding of the tradeoffs involved among active, passive,
>> and hybrid methods.
> 
> We would therefore like to make a call for adoption of the following milestone:
> 
> (date TBD): Submit an Experimental draft on coloring-based hybrid measurement methodologies for loss and delay to the IESG
> 
> and for the adoption of draft-tempia-ippm-p3m as the basis for a document meeting this milestone. Please indicate support for or concerns about adoption to the [e-mail] mailing list by Friday 29 April 2016.
> 
> Please note the IPR disclosure on draft-tempia-ippm-p3m (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/) when considering this adoption call.
> 
> Larger frameworks for the operational collection and use of metrics produced by such methodologies, however, such as described by draft-chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework, do not appear to be covered under the present charter. Therefore, we can make no call for adoption for an appropriate milestone at this time.
> 
> Thanks, cheers,
> 
> Brian and Bill, as chairs
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm