IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F72C14F70D for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwaDW90ltFuD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23791C14F6EE for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dcc80d6006aso5843798276.0 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712689986; x=1713294786; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HYJC60wkCDtydRK2wnH7gQBILVzDS6unzgx1ofVUnKQ=; b=RLp2QfAjJk+EPM9rgygElIgCCBOoVgXGZu1mJd73+CipycfUkb7WSKboBNm6gQdCOK 7llvsnH3Q2yutX5N5QgD/fAqHk8OzPU1VHrDqqOPYWHMPdzWmkqBgeRvPmW715ao81JM BrvNCB5mLLq+7WXa2xo2/y9E3HWKq66ZrBoB5fNi0j2Rx/edG8daitJ6tyih/sUZibyu so9uZyN4lc+d9+eoEPo3g7ULRmpPvJcdlKkFK0SC4IFZRgNR8f8r4DgsmE91PeG3zWmF KwTUZE9tHxi/YMwRnkGMjR77IvDwBejj03CIYKsIsNgc8PZW5vKrdKba3jhV/C3pdPfe AI3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712689986; x=1713294786; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=HYJC60wkCDtydRK2wnH7gQBILVzDS6unzgx1ofVUnKQ=; b=nouI0P4m1ypLrHdJT9NggJH3OS+RA7qhPNbWTvSUWc1r6G1jW0RoQj0D+TOJQ4Oge3 a6wXSOiVfKbM6fAa9ixaFxumyVPycrXXnXiipZ8oaSl9Pvz6+5tQlxKUhURCWFeEK4f+ 6XTNU40mQOvPc88mhOkxt3l+L0FFkBx4+qPK02+lLGiO3apjRJqpydm9B7zfSRej0ZnA NRrGJJQoBOlri4rr2g67MTdtNQ9De6yzOvUtQcQjWO9Rn/gFvp1IlodsJUN6iJWbSaEI K2CyfXSRMNPm1REaYrN9P1tQs+QeNtCRcdCGZc8DFkuaxy8qnKxDl0kFzXgG6lkDB92t sASg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz5qVWbIxLFCplkHCYjcGy6FG2rKOkvrLOyLW9F1LBNDx15esBK AcFJatkSY24H547VGik4n/mSbr/Mi1dfw0L7fneYNWrxlYX9gpXAdBvAa8r2Mul5x3aG49BsQqK eGmfQGr9VkHr4AOG4g07UxPhTJoJC9Zf1b5Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4CCm/ojSlgh2kURafIj4uMAPpBeqhc+WqxOEcnYPJr7dfOJ+WrITd3zJPgqTMzLRoBqR/0ED1WoiHoan7duE=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8e06:0:b0:dc2:2d0a:4d55 with SMTP id p6-20020a258e06000000b00dc22d0a4d55mr610225ybl.63.1712689986082; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:12:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW0rRtPSBt90pyiro1QojZnXfL=k4dk68oH5mdawb6Wgw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003b21250615aeb67e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/j53IjE5wV9r3YEfF4BTnTMSp8-Q>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 19:13:11 -0000

Hi,
I support adoption of this draft as a co-author.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 18:37 Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call
> for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts. This is a document we’ve discussed
> several times, and is a normative dependency for another document we
> discussed adopting at IETF 119, draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
>
> You can find the draft here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-04.html#name-reflected-test-packet-control
>
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think
> IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
>
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by *Tuesday, April 30*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email