IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 April 2024 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA0C14F691 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GT5JYIOfKZLC for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf33.google.com (mail-qv1-xf33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9746CC14F68F for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf33.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-69b24162dd6so18645546d6.2 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712837752; x=1713442552; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nX1wKZu4rnlf8maoi2oNo/+XWT1f+AF+10jwutX49Eo=; b=fQKlXJaTueW35DXRUDfyIcCfTdjN/7eRSlLpbOOfF5pSnWz61/0tGx0Y5ypIq4tiIp I6wpL1LJmPAR3Ak+M0z047PU0cL+yNA9iNQuKDjz6y81nCt0H7/JfhEbajpITxSA6AXC 3SFvUTilKK7ets3cPpNJWD7Hwqr16KlxFrOuE2iIGx/I0DG4UdQxS4ai03uZEkGP+r9O DEYqutTFqV3LxLwfzWv0jtQoc+hGJ0fpWtp+TW5T0O2JJT7wH5+tgqT6EeOeHOfQXLT8 eQbRbwDq/d0jzuP2CeGJ8DsSTVr16BCARpKfkJvUCZ5HFGkPuPSCyLkBBNsx48RkIi65 Ke+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712837752; x=1713442552; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nX1wKZu4rnlf8maoi2oNo/+XWT1f+AF+10jwutX49Eo=; b=ZRwDX1nQiKa9CyTBt00NtPMOYSADMTKRnwKLzcFCkycp/7kSKAXPsSyTYLj7xD8Un+ NBnqQ5HrrDei+dfCjFGaSZidlidMZvnEc1bbJ/kyVCIp3bdfHSGRCPw+NtPCcEoSJipr w0exA3jE0frh1myMkF4B/wJVbar/DuBtaO6zNvaDWbOlMIt+pQhctxEdY8vXxB7XULwi QwVW/9iLWIXIuFhTXNawTEXcWEdOjYv6rRbSQrG9Duj4GfDVpucHkqSy1NrFXSxo0ira yh2KvuhkN9s4gTx7iue94RZCiCW73vNGIdotrUOpBdwh9f9s2nlvTS4+PX073gQjaJvK VM/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyUWBQKkhxc6TawSWFbBUs41xDRAgKs1tJVHU7SM5RB6zy4Y+C5 k87BG65igqX5x3dIvRT/28SKEAqK72LuRwaNVkP/1HaU3tXuHYFk5LKaz+vLrnfThfiqJkKOlkK 8i3dQ2SmePp0+s53KN9476DYWttPnXfI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxJW6/jlFptaleMbso7GmlNY5X3SdLu4oYV3EaawTaFSvPSSzy40INzuMleY+hskyyqcE7LeGWO2IctEC5kL0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1d2c:b0:699:4493:26cc with SMTP id f12-20020a0562141d2c00b00699449326ccmr6899809qvd.65.1712837752271; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 05:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:15:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6fFQOMuoitgXe5i-C6jqiSS-3w8RB4wP3M6xRpsgB-Ybg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c83cce0615d11d99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/se55fjkacADMpJkQcsL1mbHqYc8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:15:57 -0000

Hi Tommy, WG,

Support the WG adoption of the draft. It is well written and is a useful
addition to STAMP.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:37 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello IPPM,
>
> This email starts an adoption call
> for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts. This is a document we’ve discussed
> several times, and is a normative dependency for another document we
> discussed adopting at IETF 119, draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
>
> You can find the draft here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-04.html#name-reflected-test-packet-control
>
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think
> IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
>
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by *Tuesday, April 30*.
>
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email