IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts

Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> Wed, 10 April 2024 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D2FC14F6EE for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taWyc3AGQgpA for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F26C14F5F3 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 01:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1712738931; x=1713343731; i=moeller0@gmx.de; bh=n06lplTDGGQy/hZ44fzLXrMBZnW7KCFlusXlw5xIawg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=t0d7L96Ec4U4Yn2g1LGj3YLJfmepZc4eP/5f+2X2RJorwk6IhVg+2R7vGhvBu8r3 2xzPP/RhIdZnTm+tMsm+EFtFtIHEh5i7hxvIltm21bUkfqPh7IUBbdhsHBbxwn7tq 3cGaXBF67fVjgufA9OjUJAtBmui5sUj4m0Mz4TXX3rxC9ynr9IjnpVy2DAFJms9vl zjE21IbKJ2YnpylXkR0J7W1TVkRv6ZZ9EFm0C6aKx/pyiE4IF9BaadYxrGsR9psFn Vq+cKE7bO/uEUPOx/DxYjcg3KB5GzlPQlKc9yPZgx5B8c5Trvz8Gty8kBcwV90ZRd iEu/c1oQumxYJRNgyQ==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MqJqN-1sXxAm3UDj-00nTHP for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:48:51 +0200
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:48:41 +0200
References: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
To: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <EB9C8A72-2118-4D5F-8A49-BB6CC327297F@apple.com>
Message-Id: <56A30EE5-26E6-4D6C-BD81-C1FA59941D42@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HX25REg6RW2XCtXD8uTmKkjMgFDgIaQWsj+N0SEe5SFHUIW8ATC qTMBnYpY1LMVF12oLqxSbZwUO5WyM0cRcswVXCkTha1x234EodGvMn457UGOH9sfKkHPnFQ FOf6V9NRswwc6xXw85xr1autF6xDAnxJyHB+6+4fkUoSrqWDXYqd2n02AQwv2IzcwVSglkq 4Omr4sVgP9zjM2pftyLYg==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:FqNsayWVZsQ=;rQwMzOrH8JVNNx7d+qSZ3LpsxWu tfzlb58NrjPA9/vAJDSE58l6WubG3jM7rtOfIXqRgT/277weviUpHGXQvlEhhO+AFA/H5lT2o 02oMGxwOgHVy1NaI1uBck58APLujCuaoNqjqG6OWhNaW5uXYO6xQ+4smtHQgFhAA8HEbkTYHT LSiZPArtU3as4e4fFCY99xGNLw0rKEJIsDuL2YLOOy1zpwhHh2MJn+phRmEM6g1QXbQzLBd1r CYPBUORK+4kL/gkp/BIoF6AIPFFW4QvmIWonmn0Q+51z6BUVqZIvDTVsy5NLBbGNTiiGfhCPL ja05LXpZqIkoXWguBb27KQXpcBv8gs9ECm08boSvyHfuHO2cKTu0Vl2zoGm4gCzjmcXqwb0fA GTWJd5t5Y593bDHifSBou8NuDX/t6DyNhbLnMhvON0S0WlvJ5Hkalz7HMjU1+GH5R7D/bMRpa PJnEGc+e13lKhhaH2/dMupbFMTUnuRuoJ+N3XZGMBnZZRLusRW6PsJzMGyr47Zzy1YFRh+gpz Exuj6iwspXyX4OmabyoLHI5xvxbWFWc/ZompHUtInVC3xmg9kNw/KOBB0myW+2n33aMKCt/Hn 6BqC3HMC3w6jgc9fKGXM/QWD/ubP8omTdXQxqYUYcmqTU0xleS6L2PSU9NQWxri9pqp2frfjq hvWpc+Z+gOn5LGMtg45MAT1Vgi90kJSkRLUmBw7OnLYz6ZSoFveopQ32nugmNlvdDE0Gd8nWR iR5zVy4WxdeKPQegSkeX8o8T9Knc4Ce+nn2JJ/SC5dmN55Py63CxdWnYLAncjkUfqNfP/cD2X iZRrZljJ9rAZm7s2p3UoVHum0l4nGfLcA/2uwkC1ZjDAQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/trEC0bqLU71e2t-c6dAviAvyqYY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:48:58 -0000

Dear IPPM,

a quick question, why does the security considerations section not explicitly mention the potential to use this for amplification attacks? This might be obvious, but neither this draft nor the drafts cited in security considerations mentions this.

Regards
	Sebastian


> On 9. Apr 2024, at 18:27, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> This email starts an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts. This is a document we’ve discussed several times, and is a normative dependency for another document we discussed adopting at IETF 119, draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
> 
> You can find the draft here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-04.html#name-reflected-test-packet-control
> 
> Please review the draft and respond to this email to indicate if you think IPPM should adopt this document as a working group item.
> 
> This call will last for 3 weeks. Please reply by Tuesday, April 30.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email