[IPsec] Typos in draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-04

"Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com> Thu, 28 August 2014 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <svanru@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E981A6F80 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.896
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439, STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES=1.757] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j1A9dkbB2zRw for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618611A6F83 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l4so981314lbv.24 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pRuaJcBmocFYge4VqxxpepNOB3+hWs3aTxkMxgYg9UI=; b=0MEm8LALDh79Qi8i01YXnedrXNm+/gJXJZsUeTOmJ/dHNIORZLsJ1k5QQsH8zpt4Xa FY0M8ZFPPFkH3CxkwJpyz0oprGnMFC/c4xsl8m+gDjq0JEPYFkZI/4JILXHWuc6oYYE4 KQxdkivbhMlMeii2WNb8TdBPh6ZWN4fUJYleEV+eLm6CCMcgByrzHdGkSbN6hZdzCnM0 qF1jEJdyGvt49bOhzqiT0fDMmolzN0f8X7848564NhfDxXDG0h2/nYHSapfnM7G9zuhg axDpOgN3ElWPDhA0ENAHVSUJ//WN8zA2Fy91eZnXtv1kut3hIK3aexcg1zkG6D3lMNjb oteA==
X-Received: by 10.152.245.171 with SMTP id xp11mr4731352lac.61.1409236335672; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buildpc ([93.188.44.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tc8sm6256883lbb.8.2014.08.28.07.32.14 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <C949D5C9077942ACA31105FE4156154E@buildpc>
From: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
References: <F68C660364DABE41AF4617F517EF548411707BE2@ESESSMB309.ericsson.se> <21493.55390.157248.181030@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:33:38 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/AZAlOlzdp4faZ5eDdNsWUfyNzO4
Subject: [IPsec] Typos in draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-04
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:32:20 -0000

Hi,

if new version of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis is issued,
then it is also possible fix a typo I've come across.

Section 2.8.1, second para:
   This form of rekeying may temporarily result in multiple similar SAs
   between the same pairs of nodes.  When there are two SAs eligible to
   receive packets, a node MUST accept incoming packets through either
   SA.  If redundant SAs are created though such a collision, the SA
                                                      ^^^^^^ 
s/though/through
   created with the lowest of the four nonces used in the two exchanges
   SHOULD be closed by the endpoint that created it.

Regards,
Valery.