Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

On 01/09/2006 10:54 AM, Thomas Narten allegedly wrote:
> Part of what is bugging me here is that we are responding to a very
> vague and open request for some sort of information from ITU-T. I
> don't know what their hot buttons are and what we need to be
> commenting on. So, my starting point was to take a relatively narrow
> reading of their request and try to not provide info on stuff they
> didn't ask about. Otherwise, where does it end? Besides, we want them
> to come to us with _specific_ questions.

It ends where we take it.  One alternative is we are administrative
clerks from a "protocol shop" and provide information as requested on
form 7.  Another is that this is one step toward having the IETF seen
as the clear leader on vision and strategy.  There are lots of
possible endings, depending on where you want it to go.  I suggest
choosing the ultimate goal, and making sure the liaison is a step in
that direction.

As for what they are asking, I interpreted them in previous mail,
which I can dig up if you need it.

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir