IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se> Tue, 10 January 2006 16:32 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EwMPt-0007x7-DJ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:13 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EwMPp-0007qQ-GZ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:32:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA19123; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:30:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lemland.kurtis.pp.se ([213.204.46.37]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EwMWU-0008Gh-UQ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:39:07 -0500
Received: from [172.24.120.50] (unknown [82.45.130.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by lemland.kurtis.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36A778C1F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:32:00 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <43C38113.6010508@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <200601091455.k09Et2c2020603@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <F5098923-4140-47F6-BEA1-DEB2CE368C0A@kurtis.pp.se> <43C38113.6010508@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <B548B2E0-5DAF-4C4B-9AB6-94F46BD803D9@kurtis.pp.se>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:32:23 +0100
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "<john.loughney@nokia.com> (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) John" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, IAB IAB <iab@ietf.org>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>, Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, Bradner Scott <sob@harvard.edu>, Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org

On 10 jan 2006, at 10.40, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> I have no problems with this version. I don't understand the
> mindset of the people asking the question well enough to judge
> whether it's really on target. I wonder if we are missing some
> general scene-setting at the beginning? Time is short to debate this,
> but it's possible we should say something like
>
> We remind the NGN community that IPv6 is a relatively conservative
> replacement for IPv4, intentionally with no revolutionary features,
> and that it is intended to overcome the addressing limitations and
> some specific omissions in IPv4 without in any way fundamentally
> changing the nature of the Internet. As such, we see very limited risk
> and much to gain by unambiguous adoption of IPv6.
>
> Or something.

I would be happy with that addition...

- kurtis -

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email