[ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

Howdy,

 From a 30k foot perspective, looks good to me, with one
caveat -- I realize that the last para is "polite", but
I'm always concerned about setting expectations appropriately.

Your text:

"The IETF appreciates the interest of Q.9/13 and the good cooperation 
between ITU and the IETF. We are delighted to cooperate and are looking 
forward for further questions and input regarding the IETF technical work."

I think, perhaps:

The IETF appreciates the interest of Q.9/13 and the continuing 
cooperation between ITU and the IETF.  Please let us know if there are 
further questions concerning IETF technical work, and we would welcome 
the opportunity to direct your members to appropriate IETF Working 
Groups to carry out the technical discussion more directly.

?

WRT from whom -- I'm happy if it comes from Margaret as AD of
the implicated WGs, and if need be I can help facilitate things
with the Tool.

Leslie.

Scott W Brim wrote:
> I've attached some marked-up Word.  It's your liaison but I have some
> suggestions.
> 
>   - Jonne's preamble and postamble
> 
>   - (Obviously) take out the text in italics, which was my summary of
>     what I thought they would want to hear.
> 
>   - Under IPv4/v6 interaction and transition, do you want to mention
>     softwires?
> 
>   - Significant editorial stuff like SCPT -> SCTP (see mark-up)
> 
> I've also proposed some smaller editorial stuff if you want it.  I
> hope I got the indentation right.
> 
> Finally, there's the question of who sends the liaison.  Kurtis,
> Margaret, Leslie ... ??  That's up to you all, but we should decide
> soon :-)
> 
> Thanks much ... Scott

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir