IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: “DHCPv6, SLAAC, Static Day X - 17 year interoperability issue” 2nd issue

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 10 November 2020 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E27C3A03FB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qRezC0k89e1A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com (mail-qv1-xf35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6423A03F8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:31:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id x13so3886288qvk.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:31:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=/yjbQnz8ikUy9q5A6W4gJghhpKPF96PSpOd9vmZPI5M=; b=e5OQDO/B71kSg4LGCVSqC2dysjgrYvhOex7AP5Cq7vjdtUS/k0FLB6R5GuYBWKlRAy MElr/k/8xN3buEtd+a7PARbVjL9Ft0DoBMlMfW2reqHH0oOOStvaTSwOQcAZ9Ir77JQv Cn0Op/PrqYcEv/13NJ7X73pdG5RO7niHSiSj1nPoyvA44+IHAmbqEbQfK3YYRsZQEUj4 w27Jq26ShG6D6pVyMuqrj2IKdIRIh7IGsRJYjHvtFJeSajYbcLmvsEBZIBa/Nr9sBv/m UWu9fR7QSSN1bX/WfsutXT+Hz6SgedeOcOwXepnrBrN4dxlT3knwel3R9rXppB3OarO/ +mRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=/yjbQnz8ikUy9q5A6W4gJghhpKPF96PSpOd9vmZPI5M=; b=iq3j1eaPi6U8hu/S5tBooLoNapw4n8w4ehdfNy9pqixg9XUGHqlT815fOVthHj6FDj B7gk2CzNXmwPEYJ/t2PxRZ6YFXGXUQJ9F3vPRcP4BHbN/ctvLl0EvUXyQF3g6h889+ej 11cspGwJlv7bspzssrPV2kgw3ZgYy5JHQhUsdVyanNu+88jHaFqudtkOf6QmCN2e26i8 K+4MSXuBD20lYYElFWjpbfrMiuFxLUki6livDSC9s52LtSjaSjaogArR8qsQgZwiDVII tOyrHip1GUQIog3CfynrLm7kIPYn+0On3MObBrdwvOGD0BWgQdmkrKT2HNLHjqLFIQsV h8Zg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MWr9BmK3H3v07qjxhRvC1E4mjUsBAzmgEMk67AAaNZcXdALYz 1+xAxpIW5OrXhHI4MSRL0wHRIA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzppaYej/orsSOEyVcFACcdiFjnxBsbFvlzUQ4yROiYqNNMhaoTc+ydouMCkvSD5ygB5MoUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d414:: with SMTP id t20mr156974qvh.34.1604979102691; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e22sm6982249qtq.38.2020.11.09.19.31.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:31:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <61D91FAE-C7AF-48E6-AE90-638F92E4EB35@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_24706B5B-4E53-4E15-826D-09D6ED602C7E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: “DHCPv6, SLAAC, Static Day X - 17 year interoperability issue” 2nd issue
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 22:31:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSnw+DG+sDb1ddHVudZdHsGWcN+8GgJd2DKrqpBG3WWUg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Dusan Mudric <dmudric@avaya.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
References: <3A94E3B6-EA5A-453A-8CB1-C11BBDF88B53@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcy3eo=4P52fOjCKRLDveVMUJcD7Y_u9JzJtpq3RAj0Q@mail.gmail.com> <636E07D5-2554-40A7-9C3B-C699EA29BD52@isc.org> <CAD6AjGSnw+DG+sDb1ddHVudZdHsGWcN+8GgJd2DKrqpBG3WWUg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-lidFDPincTPCCmPwn9ezj0ipm0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:31:46 -0000

On Nov 9, 2020, at 10:15 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
> The force required to break the current stasis is more than i have, if i must use dhcpv6.  Again, many years of proof. 

So, to summarize, the problem is that you can’t get your IT department to install DHCPv6 servers?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email