Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks

Usman Latif <osmankh@yahoo.com> Thu, 27 September 2012 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <osmankh@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777B321F8639 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYllX8-RoWrv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D35C321F8629 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.226.180] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 05:51:39 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.235] by tm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 05:51:39 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Sep 2012 05:51:39 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 699320.94429.bm@omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 13473 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Sep 2012 05:51:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1348725099; bh=Ji3EQazPd29ukitIRHNOHB0uSmUcyUr7LKugWjjHZ8M=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kv4sH5f5WYSjkZYGm8hz8KBjYdE03vx0zNk4pj3gapk8MadUeil+gawSlz963A33f8TAH/UqcZsogPA+lEcTHwp9Xu3+srR88XB17d2fi6kTp6sgozbibdoWG6a0r3HodEE6hG8urc5/hsYnk6b+dENzFNsxzqrwGsQWUbikUnc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ovb3raQlcyne3iQ9Mm0BnMsFkZHGv0xmyM3OwDy44cuoBt9mnCqFpOpKDP693kOZYKoQZ7bEE/hfT/lXfDznhEDasHJAyx/5zegmjaAHuApfNqr0i8fyF4Sc9dXZXv2KR/tzNdEQsnqLoDjXfKK9rlvz63cBOthD3xl9HTaRA5c=;
X-YMail-OSG: Mi2w7r4VM1kKshTpmwmCttYtbTrQuan9xlNI_JAq1JA.MN5 vq7rdV1i_PL5WTksbRW1_Mck2oRF7lVJeEK_3aXz3I3.ip2o5.Fp3F_cJSeI h62Dgnqk8pcGy7wGyIdfi.J.fea6wV93atc14BZ_teywoq4tSjIUOghRJiQV ipqMQeriuc2duVkRhvxgXI0.Mc6ADu6mJmICYEUWvxOBTA1ICEoWGh66AFh0 0PkNQHorxOKkd88evPo2nLwP.SNBqSGR4W0I2jZ76LByu5Zq2JFXqtl9jePw CVvWt2v38uq4YJ7WoHjz5qgYrsTqb.v9.8WUm5p7UUic6ks4qGWRyeFtNrqI xEKQXoI2FRKyA1TTXf3pWygvqKjp8w0nNJQ0lThib.G2EmC1UjtK1nefIjuT KGZKqmMGzI847Zk0dujmvsgeV6XaWVaaixy7nLH15yEYCC_W0ZFn_OmRZe7g bmVveWZze.LLHnIXBoVgBH.rfu5TLWPzBF05hkSLKbEsZOnSHdneIKb_Bi_z eJbL1yD164Bvm0A--
Received: from [203.94.155.226] by web126002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:51:39 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.434
Message-ID: <1348725099.51734.YahooMailClassic@web126002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Usman Latif <osmankh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2obks3wcx.wl%randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1915680061-1517217935-1348725099=:51734"
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:51:43 -0000

--- On Thu, 27/9/12, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:


From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks
To: "Usman Latif" <osmankh@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Ole Trøan" <otroan@employees.org>rg>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Received: Thursday, 27 September, 2012, 9:17 AM


> There is clearly two set of recommendations over the same addressing
> scenario which I am only trying to clarify with the IETF community.

no.  but please go do whatever you want in your network and stop trying
to stir a long cold pot

randy

 
I would only if I owned the whole internet :)

If you have links to any previous discussions / blogs on this long cold pot, pls point me to them so I can convince myself that both 5375 and 6164 have same recommendations for /127 (and /128)
 
Usman