Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 27 September 2012 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3BB21F866A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Em6HIJJcddSj for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074721F8666 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1TH60l-000Jyl-IO; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:47:43 +0000
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:47:42 +0200
Message-ID: <m2obks3wcx.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Usman Latif <osmankh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks
In-Reply-To: <1348704486.49402.YahooMailClassic@web126005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <3C3333E3-9F4A-4522-94BD-F92B72C8B9A6@employees.org> <1348704486.49402.YahooMailClassic@web126005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:47:46 -0000

> There is clearly two set of recommendations over the same addressing
> scenario which I am only trying to clarify with the IETF community.

no.  but please go do whatever you want in your network and stop trying
to stir a long cold pot

randy