Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks

sthaug@nethelp.no Sat, 29 September 2012 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE55321F8476 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ng4VI6XQ0X6R for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7358521F8470 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 67394 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2012 10:09:04 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 29 Sep 2012 10:09:04 -0000
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20120929.120904.74687641.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: evyncke@cisco.com
Subject: Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and Device Loopbacks
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E111838FA3@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <3C3333E3-9F4A-4522-94BD-F92B72C8B9A6@employees.org> <D80DAC61-5AA7-45EA-8262-0E0F386BCE42@gmail.com> <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E111838FA3@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:09:08 -0000

> See also: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-01 which has been discussed today at the Large Interim Meeting

Minor point about this draft: To me there's a contradiction between

2.1 "These link-local addresses SHOULD be hard-coded to prevent
the change of EUI-64 addresses when changing of MAC address"

and

2.2 "Lower configuration complexity: LLAs require no specific
configuration"

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no