Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Sat, 12 March 2011 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639553A687D for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:03:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcOHc0KvfwCC for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF2D3A686A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so3695362bwz.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:04:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IMH99Gs4so3brOgm8+2JkniiBn3xtDf+Fr6bQTOTr4=; b=Dh7Mz+34p/rbDwE0znCfYrup2INqJ3q1vrWjrY34T+hNY4j/1KhTiZrbkRvtcBoTww X9DiChTR3W9UA6MMDva3Sd8Wa/a3bf1dWeUQjuVCuCOc5xmkTh/RyU5PS4s0ogS/Knoy w5P1ky5B9j0TbqGgTtvNRUawNzv+cJrLjn0PA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lbS13XMZb2yEDGHcyna0ArZD/5P9XyMNJbHi/7xIx21k+EQmO5dDRx/ZIUSfv2Cox5 izxom1TnuaAYhgFR6eM5GTyKur5BG0IgB+ttGOsoHGMOZvUDkNcd2kFeY1c+exuC0r8c XkBXpgSrV+YLqoR+sT1SPnSx304z0y44n5M/4=
Received: by 10.204.127.88 with SMTP id f24mr4455383bks.54.1299927886069; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.200.28] ([194.2.150.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c11sm2101646bkc.14.2011.03.12.03.04.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 03:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D7B5347.7070900@gont.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:04:39 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: huabing yu <yhb810501@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt
References: <7111FC5F-BC3F-4242-9C3F-037E79894749@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091212570.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se> <AANLkTim7W3BCCgW_Hpvr3p+SdYobpk-yoZYTtbWxL14r@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim7W3BCCgW_Hpvr3p+SdYobpk-yoZYTtbWxL14r@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:03:27 -0000

On 09/03/2011 09:19 a.m., huabing yu wrote:

> (1)If "H" ("Hardware-derived addresses") flag is 1, it indicates that
> the host SHOULD generate hardware-derived addresses, and doesn't 
> generate privacy addresses.
> (2)If "H" ("Hardware-derived addresses") flag is 0, the author say that 
> this bit indicates that Privacy Extensions SHOULD be enabled 
> when configuring IPv6 addresses as a result of Stateless Address
> Autoconfiguration,
> *but many people will think that it indicates that the host doesn't
> generate *
> *hardware-derived addresses, and SHOULD generate privacy addresses. It may *
> *result in a misunderstanding.*

I don't really follow the potential misunderstanding. Anyway see version
-01 of the document (that I've just posted).

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1