Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Fri, 11 March 2011 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078E73A67F2 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:52:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xjmekyT3nPI for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD02D3A6819 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 15681 invoked by uid 399); 11 Mar 2011 02:53:31 -0000
Received: from router.ka9q.net (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@75.60.237.91) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 11 Mar 2011 02:53:31 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 75.60.237.91
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4D798EA9.2070402@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:53:29 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110304 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt
References: <7111FC5F-BC3F-4242-9C3F-037E79894749@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091212570.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se> <AANLkTim7W3BCCgW_Hpvr3p+SdYobpk-yoZYTtbWxL14r@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091552560.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091552560.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:52:16 -0000

On 03/09/2011 06:57, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> If you want to know the mac address of the computer who used an IP
> address at a certain time, then you need to tell the host to only use
> EUI64 based address and nothing else, you don't tell it to disable
> privacy extensions. Just because privacy extensions is the only address
> widely seen today as being non-EUI64, doesn't mean that if you disable
> privacy, you get only single EUI64.

Right. When I was at Yahoo! we had a db of mac addresses of authorized 
hosts, and used that to drive configuration of the switches, dhcp, dns, 
etc. that way we could be sure that only authorized hosts had access to 
the network. If you don't manage access at the switch level, you can't 
guarantee what the client is going to do, regardless of what flags are 
sent in SLAAC.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/