IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt

"Yu Hua bing" <yhb810501@gmail.com> Wed, 16 March 2011 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <yhb810501@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BAE3A69B6 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2V8rwGLyFo1 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE77F3A69B2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so1958920vxg.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=L8BhaDzltr0vocYquqHQcpmsNJNJtFFfAcz3fhcedjE=; b=ih48pnVA0PejuSQtQDajTKp2gR6/3Ypk03NLxm7ypZvVEZLFP5/p5gkpwTnkZqcZEx 16vWxTyukBmj+YtkhKWmI8/RremHPGET5DQvu1pQ3Ml/h47dPimAbCcWCR34XQfzcbJe g6HDs4WoU+J+ckZC/8SacI18gAL0DFad7BAwY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=Z+AzziewnXQ2JCnz3vArLbS9oukzNmObqPs9tJsGIQjQh/asAzZeQKqh/s7tsFICn6 9il6YKEAQCGs9jVr7tDWjQEVxzfv3QuUM2/VejqmMS8XaEyuljKIIf9ImbuhS4AXtnLo EhGWDe04egRSOq0dA/3yB2wPzmexK5vuIJbIM=
Received: by 10.52.175.100 with SMTP id bz4mr8653vdc.261.1300284872910; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yhbPC ([220.200.24.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc20sm359589vdb.9.2011.03.16.07.14.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <AAB2A33432A6460490005A0EF60D3A9E@yhbPC>
From: Yu Hua bing <yhb810501@gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
References: <7111FC5F-BC3F-4242-9C3F-037E79894749@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103091212570.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4D77CBB9.1080702@gmail.com> <20110310071925.309d467b@opy.nosense.org> <4D7F539E.7030308@gont.com.ar><4D7FE55B.7050207@gmail.com> <4D80166A.9060502@gont.com.ar><22F6318E46E26B498ABC828879B08D4F0C40AA@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4D80ADCF.7060409@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4D80ADCF.7060409@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:14:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:13:07 -0000

>Our draft is not meant to propose "not to use privacy addresses" -- as
>noted a few times, already, the proposed mechanism could be used to turn
>"privacy addresses" on for some systems that have decided not to enable
>them by default (e.g., FreeBSD).

Windows provides the command line to turn on or off the privacy extension.
Is your meaning is that if the user turn off the privacy extension, the RAG
flag in the router advertisement can turn on the privacy extension?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email