IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt

sthaug@nethelp.no Sat, 12 March 2011 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC2C3A6A8B for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:07:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qf1BiYukrKaP for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4473A3A69F6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 29152 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2011 16:08:31 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 12 Mar 2011 16:08:31 -0000
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:08:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20110312.170831.74726157.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: scott.brim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-managing-privacy-extensions-00.txt
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik4FEfjUjwH4EsVHA6kQRQ+6PcMNEX6=4e6FqM_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <22F6318E46E26B498ABC828879B08D4F0C15B1@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <EF3F736B-777F-4F03-8AB5-62D46452B942@townsley.net> <AANLkTik4FEfjUjwH4EsVHA6kQRQ+6PcMNEX6=4e6FqM_@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-brim-mobility-and-privacy@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, huitema@microsoft.com
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:07:14 -0000

> Blue sky: Could the SP allow privacy addresses, at least for global
> use, and log its own mappings between privacy addressses and MACs or
> other persistent identifiers?  Then it can always trace back to
> determine who did what if necessary.

I'm sure service providers *could* do this. But it's probably not
significantly simpler than just assigning an address using DHCPv6
or Radius - so where's the incentive for the service provider to do
such logging?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email