IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 06 September 2019 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD61120C28 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xK-BvFAxNr8Y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DFE120C60 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id u184so2837685qkd.4 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l5gSRcJPw12IJrjtr/uZPY2bpNDhHQNekcL1KstXumk=; b=AA/56K1cUJPLQw97BKZRiZ4TeR+gPo3sTjMV4XwPwbmlZVdQdRO0WjJoR1vnyVsff8 YmAa4Azc6tBk2m97UPqdf0CSJMb1+uKU5jOfR3SiCpLWiypDbj5Rzepj8P1UTsHFZnJr QKY3YakzOyyN7FpXCj0VAN/6ExfEvhqaN62NdhMbFJJ1VXVxOxFbbvbPe4gq03DDdw74 ZUyXUFoqStoshSZQexTAKTuDkaQ59r5sW2B0pgL5HvRA2cE+it4kxM20B4PuzCamSfbq dcCkelnZ9XPKMzcZbDLUm00uTTInrbGn9bOlKFP0OwDcG9Ibh00MM+0CM5eQeL23ffY8 o2FA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l5gSRcJPw12IJrjtr/uZPY2bpNDhHQNekcL1KstXumk=; b=XC6hJOBtXDbzDxCblxesP0XZ8fvg7GhENMkKAPw0ngIwlXYNHmfI+VgieNCtj2ujE0 C1rYAWDDEIZ8Lm2oF32lB+9xFPrC+8gFP1+ROyh0vJ3CWKlYnoKwx2XpiSCit2AjBhRE sKQAKrFzsdQqqOn938Nc+qVN2TRMSOeK+9S9hRq+OSm3oC/9LbZhVYFO+moj/fPqp9b/ cNfMxu8SW2sQVwWcyTMOveQq38m2XhIg059O4RjCf9xw8WtbBtRPcsk59dODUbA3SGzU TeWKi0N4Ol6x4Jfc3ZcdjlL+BYHGS+UfZ8j9WH9RLudzKUPl5D3x0HJRdh3HiG8pbbbp o76w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUttb8XAnCIK3f6zxorqnv3j+LPsoEXnKmnrtskGsMBnOsBXKZ Z2g1iG7IITw4IKzuwO5fbkBcHZRo2bj35aOO0CQX7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRzY0OysoTryEvrF2RzfDMemSI6YvG9ZaOx7fcL2SJS4f96nk3v5NJSrhf3cUE53nJfBnEPIhfhAvPruFQ+/M=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:2784:: with SMTP id n126mr8626886qkn.302.1567779490351; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 07:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHd-QWtA21+2Sm616Fnw0D-eB7SNb_BeG8-A-MCLLFgTwSpOsg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB54632F09C712ADB30138CFA9AEBE0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR19MB3415D21403394F8129A4BAD8FCB90@BYAPR19MB3415.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <30491F13-C652-45C3-AB2B-95F765FBB4EA@juniper.net> <65C5CB04-3A2F-4F83-A7C8-2045154F93AE@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB5463EC3250F2A303A3641839AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <91CBADAD-EFE6-46E1-A9D3-DAA111357179@juniper.net> <CAOj+MMGyUFRPDqCBo5SbLX486o_9GLpM6Zxf8KSt1voWiqhkGQ@mail.gmail.com> <E8D473B5-3E8D-4339-9A79-0CAE30750A55@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <E8D473B5-3E8D-4339-9A79-0CAE30750A55@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 16:17:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFOy5PyTo=jPJkVrQOctdWjsTbD=7ix-2n89vodKzT3gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.
To: Srihari Sangli <ssangli@juniper.net>
Cc: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Rob Shakir <robjs@google.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009be3b30591e31b82"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/LbRxICmyyNXnQRiHPyanmFXdrCM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:18:26 -0000

I don't think so.

In OAM packets are on purpose made huge - even up to MTU to make sure real
customer packets can go through or to detect and diagnose MTU issues. So
adding SRH to it is nothing one can call inefficient.

Wrong tree :)

Cheers,
R.

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 4:14 PM Srihari Sangli <ssangli@juniper.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 06/09/19, 4:32 PM Robert Raszuk from robert@raszuk.net said >
>
>
>
> Not really. Only SR OAM packets may need it. Is that a real problem ?
>
>
>
> Thanks for clarification. Like Ron pointed out before, its inefficient
> encoding.
>
>
>
> srihari…
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email