Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

Nick,

How about using ULAs as defined in RFC4193 ?

After all isn't local IPv6 FC00::/7 address block defined precisely for
such private use cases like the one which uSID requires?

Clearly RIRs will not allocate /22 blocks left and right and that v6 prefix
would be required if I have 1000 node network and my uSID is /32.

Thx,
R.

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:33 PM Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> Ron Bonica wrote on 01/09/2019 22:10:
> > -
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-02
>
> Ron,
>
> if this draft proposes using up to /32 per router in a SRv6 domain, or
> even /40 to /48, it may be appropriate to solicit input from RIR address
> policy groups about the impact this may have on ipv6 assignment /
> allocation policies.
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>