IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 06 September 2019 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702FC1208A1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oup_aVJlO-Iz for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C775712001B for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id x5so5503832qkh.5 for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BGbiQ4pG577z/GQItdtWs67HdjH8gKev9ZvODV3ftv8=; b=EjeGYMe6RK9QglbpCqEn9LIYMh21C/4UbJws8Zo7OkrRwnm0Gh2FnQrwSKm4FnOjPY z+Mpi34wSuSKf6k+qmoMGgkYI/mUEyu6IRmMM384afM8zTJl01CcDN0XZUotJjCxf3Bq JHAhrdRK97KmLdjPpbgixn98rtINVDSRVoWxeLjDao+/yDRsYpvlDtyvucVzyfhreOrb 2o9JAq7YFVHIk1Ha/UbHKyv1oUU3rD0OSlMMEymeef84Ja0u/fctOqY/bhFWwllxve77 aI5OJJLvYkHX8B+tpF1tXjngV1aPbf+qGCedRBbcoIUkbTrhtl530A9xeMzfnZApGm4b TvdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BGbiQ4pG577z/GQItdtWs67HdjH8gKev9ZvODV3ftv8=; b=DIOu3HMCF+35zpfH7wCc35jOagnFdwWmH9IiU5GDJm+kdAhNR6SudEmwOnFqQsvWl3 l/zEwAyps8hhhVcWyC35kYIUNOx6BzVGkmbJHtg2I+cUWHSSIrZ4xu3q3E32aGqM0PvE 2UpZk+uYnzlFzUjHMZhcWBTZpbVNbU8Br97a2dV4LdL35Cdpoxu1iBc9A/c917lXAo23 2hmHceriL7NMpgGovwmiNVw1kBvVhHc8giE9HF4pbOxocIvutYWOLdAhvxsh/5p3P1LH xpT0eKqXzEtMIwXn2QHwFQTRzpZ8MXK4hQlzYJxlfsF7rpfqdG6ArUZwA4wC2EMqVvcc OqzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUV7heYxVl3Z1Ohgesl8mVddGmh7ri1PNZv36wnBYI52PcHFFls sH67gYLh4wTK1yh4h+K3SBxdG23+vYXI9PG3iyg3e3cc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgUcIzdWsRy9e02J/FUeDm2/MMyzXhT3hn1+yggXI/abDtPFNcxlguWUX4jQVLEnMQ/ptWqSePi+PyTZVZbPI=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6144:: with SMTP id v65mr8286441qkb.465.1567774960593; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR05MB5463EC3250F2A303A3641839AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <9CCE1F5C-A886-4B06-8B97-D0645CFFE5E2@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB54637D3761C4BCC2B452241FAEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20190906.084132.330516044.sthaug@nethelp.no> <BYAPR05MB5463A172548A67614E705B66AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB5463A172548A67614E705B66AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:02:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHeKAez=7TLLye_cBX-gPxRCejbSyQ+HkF23UKa8rMsvA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d3f4b0591e20d4a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YMLfBP_o_wKb7Fjf3ic8jGA4hGc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:02:44 -0000

>
> Vanilla TRACEROUTE reveals all of the mapping information. RFC 5837 offers
> some nice extras, but isn't strictly required.
>

Really ?

If your traffic policy steers some TCP traffic for ports 4000-5000 to take
segment A-B-C-D and for ports 6000-7000 to take segment A-E-F-G-D how your
vanilla traceroute is going to discover it when running the traceroute from
outside of the network ?

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email