a draft about on-link and submit prefixes

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 13 March 2017 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F838129562 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bb5HEZRLKErZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AF912945F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y76so235633326qkb.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kPwDCspX+dvPY1YLI91CWG7JR9QS+M7ldv/iHUgBaO0=; b=fOAL40hUX43bvfbyFkqhoYYheroLuYm7TOQ9i3kWLwNpMAmlhhEEX4KvJZQpDgKr4d bly9n5FtznX2ZxrdZfOC/M4EawoAGIGs/m3G8Qkhl8Zw7UzGxALpJbTjQhBayrrlmrW9 DBityQNkv5kErYQPR4SX/chTw+kRYiSvgR0g1Dwen2SvVXUk0CnhliQ+SXnMGw/Jb0oL sZVMMFGJygFRSKgGZkszcuknCWyGogSHTwiWWXem6XyUsuTXuYBg7txRGtMu0owsQgqS kcgz7Xq5PBANunxDqAmcllF8I0YRESySL9rB/IY/e3MOIaVVUkmLwt16nlFekKWIGxbn 21Mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=kPwDCspX+dvPY1YLI91CWG7JR9QS+M7ldv/iHUgBaO0=; b=VheKXy9Av8IA9+ISTi/JKdXldJX++CnB4NapTFYKPeE/Yfvtp97BDRkfFboBgBz74T a2mscF6hUjpH1mO09O/0jCJ3fpw+2T99AhAJESM1icJkhe0M/61Af0so7d3XhazmHPLg 7SzdlczyVmZK4nS9VRrkES3TBKTt0KYar+uk6DRIygQ1Aj5vaPA5ScUueUCC1uEEWseA gIuGOR/uMXAaPe4p2gf7i6sN/fA9t9LlouG2cnddQYsQUGRAEbHQ3jtcOni2TtrdTUV6 ysvCYoxejWCcH9wvAwD8SvQaP8idJI1oHWfxDXWbETxwHiRlS2E/IfMeJsXXZhCXA7DJ iVfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1XXepQ4Hz79yHjSYwsoKN9SlUK+WaOd9QwDL+D7yqcXHhfoLcf42W6c+L7fWBIj8ZF8OQ5dawh+zaYwA==
X-Received: by 10.55.123.129 with SMTP id w123mr33073042qkc.20.1489446876976; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.61.204 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:14:36 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oBaGiaSE3jlnCh9TDBiPmCUvDbc
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqdd9OXOi+SZ8_OfGWXxEoKSfoR6=Lp3-_=vEaWbjx4udw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: a draft about on-link and submit prefixes
To: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/VeS4vc3zzI0FkBAzh02a6WA9oaw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:14:39 -0000

I've submitted a new individual draft on the separation between
on-link and (SLAAC) subnet prefixes, at the risk of stating the
obvious: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jinmei-6man-prefix-clarify/

In fact, it was actually too obvious to myself until a few weeks ago,
but I realized it might not be as obvious as I originally thought
through recent discussions on the wg list.  So I thought it may still
be worth clarifying explicitly.  At least I can just refer to it next
time this topic is brought up, instead of explaining it from the
scratch again.  Hopefully it's useful for some others, too.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya