Re: a draft about on-link and submit prefixes

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BD51293E0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHOcs46nXaNS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81543127A90 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r136so51124316vke.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=acj6sd8IhE47NIrmnyOJHAmed0noh1PScn+0scf8PZU=; b=hxOuvCOgxShTvzvFuOHv6uc+rWgqFl+eLP8NM9h/ULMSLYbao+bqhkZsFy2/Wqq5bx MFgkYk1FBS+0KlK4cFEaASyIi8KOpeYVRIjlr/6TXFbBMm9k2Be10MeIyVCCO1zrKK5Q XmJcBanAi1x8yFAak/7dGIiAZHovEBwYTFUEU5+xKbnRWknBlKjmKp3sKz1WNaKOruyF F0ro8lMdhecciY9sU/Uogrt9TZiBJD87I+RIsPXrgHz0aUaclxSRnoD42qZWDChu49Cy JiRrr757Jg9aCpc0JFGQbdgYrQRDX0OBmCDAzCthV2A29ma9P397onv1xEH8Hrl3TWUa y9VQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=acj6sd8IhE47NIrmnyOJHAmed0noh1PScn+0scf8PZU=; b=QMB24DwuKXj6cDnz9xrj1zIMql7y7X/k3psH7ZxDO+nnJZ+vnOKkakr2INl/mbwj8t qQRZS38AsLSSF6iWutW2yX9qDnJuYQ5NKVbgdNN42ogM8UwiB+vxyzyUJjL6jpMNxoLS 8guqvv8wMwkyUy60bLpgFXnewxRVC20jF5mOdUJyycLFht+8hcuHHxN0nH13KA5lQZXE ky4jfGxMWEUYfOM5HBFijN1/qWi9m8Or1asPw9B+o2v9yXscPKI/vU1rxPn9m4qXIxBu GahTpTOhSsOkf/7AWMTdTFjI4KpVdK5WyZbx17j7DJBA9xoEN/VRsvKFO7q1qSg9PNfO mfaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39llzNS5gytxyLxqJ+sabyUAF2LA3REnc1AB4L//DGT5bbDYCjXYleOFZOukkNC8lD65XnSSMCDaBYTUIWCD
X-Received: by 10.31.170.15 with SMTP id t15mr14853824vke.6.1489495745269; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170314.132640.74662612.sthaug@nethelp.no>
References: <BD1C6A8D-F9D6-44D4-9911-20E1DE3F1658@employees.org> <49C05C3D-9594-4A46-BBA4-5767A9FDD34A@jisc.ac.uk> <026FE8B0-6FFA-4835-8D72-D4CBC6187A2D@employees.org> <20170314.132640.74662612.sthaug@nethelp.no>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:48:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1G-65Vw0OyKP8CDPuUY7+-Q_hBrLY8E6wAoHHYM9jHsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: a draft about on-link and submit prefixes
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11432250caef1d054ab04004"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/y9i7poD_r5ukJDs1htJeDhsCgDA>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:49:07 -0000

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:26 PM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:

> Could an IPv6 subnet be defined *without esoteric examples*?
>
> If not - maybe the IPv6 subnet concept is too complex to be useful?
>

Let's go back to IPv4, it's easy to understand.