IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi> Wed, 18 July 2012 01:17 UTC

Return-Path: <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0784521F855F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDfEk1mWJtWe for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw-out2.cc.tut.fi (mail-gw-out2.cc.tut.fi [130.230.160.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C9611E8079 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 82e6a021-b7f236d000000a82-2c-50060eb83deb
Received: from mail1.tut.fi (mail1.tut.fi [130.230.162.19]) by mail-gw-out2.cc.tut.fi (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 48.6C.02690.8BE06005; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:17:44 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:708:310:52:21a:6bff:fe61:167] (pool46.nat64.trex.fi [195.140.194.46]) by mail1.tut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DE4740344; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:17:44 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <50060EB3.9060308@tut.fi>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:17:39 +0300
From: Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>
Organization: Tampere University of Technology / Department of Communications Engineering
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi> <23986.1341586765@marajade.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <23986.1341586765@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXS9GyRsO4OPrYAgwPHhC1enn3PZNFzqJ/d 4kNnC6vFn89v2B1YPOY8es/qsWTJTyaPljl7mD3W7PvBEsASxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUxf95m loI97BVPnj1ibmD8xtrFyMEhIWAicfyeaxcjJ5ApJnHh3no2EFtIYB+jxM7lMl2MXED2AUaJ J3PvsoAkeAVUJQ4fvcQG0ssCZJ+/UwASZhPQkbjSdQusl18gWuL1ub/sILaoQIjE9OaDTBCt ghInZz4BGyMioCex/MgzRhCbWcBWovfFXGYQW1jAUOLmrfksEDf4Sdy7NB+sl1PAVGLi7n3M EPU2En9PLGKBsOUltr+dwzyBUXAWkhWzkJTNQlK2gJF5FaNYbmJmjm56uW5+aYmRXnKyXklp iV5a5iZGcFAvUNzBeGqG/iFGAQ5GJR7eG5tZA4RYE8uKK3MPMUpyMCmJ8m7nZQsQ4kvKT6nM SCzOiC8qzUktPsQowcGsJMIr+ByonDclsbIqtSgfJiXDwaEkwfsdpE2wKDU9tSItMwcYuzBp Jg5OkHYeoPbrIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4yKUuK8nMDYFxIASWSU5sH1ghJH/f///18xigMdK8z7 DqSdB5h04LpfAQ1mAhpsWcIEMrgkESEl1cAYMlE7aN8xsW/+9X4ft3Bs/W9WaMPPG/txzX7L 1TJHGF7N2fqPZ9vu9d7fDYwdtt/q8w0SSjQ9e/xCrWvd7O/neurZcovibh0v2e/dc7d1dYyn xOLnb5+G9V+4lPtFSN/8Vkbx0fqfovf3ejtXdDNwXXpzSbfh+oWIrBWLfTz/n8i5lpznUftR iaU4I9FQi7moOBEAs8tuNfcCAAA=
Cc: sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn, ipv6@ietf.org, niu.qibo@zte.com.cn
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:17:01 -0000

Hi,

Sorry for late response. It's the summer holiday season here. O:-)

On 07/06/2012 05:59 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>>>>>> "Aleksi" == Aleksi Suhonen<Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>  writes:
>      Aleksi>  Within an hour, all the IPv4 addresses in the pool for our
>      Aleksi>  NAT64 were registered to this one device.
>
> Do I understand that you attempt to provide a single IPv4 address 1:1
> with a an internal IPv6 address? (NAT vs NAPT)

Yes. Stateless NAT64. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6144#section-3.2.1

> Can you tell me what your expiry time is for reclaiming the IPv4 address?

2 hours. However, anything above 5 minutes will yield the same result on 
today's Internet. And 5 minutes is too short.

> Would IPv6 ping'ing the internal device help?

Hmm? Help with what? I'm not sure I understand you.

-- 
	Aleksi Suhonen, Researcher
	Department of Communications Engineering
	Tampere University of Technology

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email