IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8392D1316EF; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy2-BJG3Vi0S; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x241.google.com (mail-io0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF221316DF; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x241.google.com with SMTP id f103so3438980ioi.2; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k8AKD/ic+Z/Rl8U0gVP1nnucq5l9rr2MKlSwGfLTsH0=; b=L+02JaxDGNwyTEPtAR5YJGlcwEjNeOq4F7lKI9CtiT7RYy2DhPHqT4YEAevKybq5Qm SeCGmHCBc5xEcjBoA0o9fm328dHfqw1m/rVD8c4A+7CnCUrkhVn596GneTgp8X0KNcpT 2VoHHz2yRCCQD8KXWiAVBkWKemvRy7rDxqYoDqSgCRiO8bOjcqQMZMcHVnyMpMN7Jd5K QmGZxWSAP/r0W61PQavrb2Iu/j4fWLGjldUpcDclaMw11I4RoPq/HGANwa+9Pj7h09KX eToOr6CxnQxgjKiIE+oDsQ0+mPFM0jEhclR2eK7OdXXRXIBMcNWZqiwCbFWZqpeccDdn IAjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k8AKD/ic+Z/Rl8U0gVP1nnucq5l9rr2MKlSwGfLTsH0=; b=uTPRur52hE548gI8sQDVfBREdDprAfK6hJFaKBZlfeM9YjbfbgpyYxU5jSBchuyzMA NP+BfrYOPcjD/gznTEHr4xTYTAAgmhAKDKvnrRqtu9i7F7W5IxmmolIfxGmL6iNbUx/5 C0/M77NBoj/IlPEJSPk7q7PwgxwLX04+lQLtwcNu8PkKDM91ceDeqXsGY9FQ9q3xM6Kf 01SR09JKeBOFoBdej4s5cSOPcrnOSUFneg6urJ1dJSeio9T5vDUFgAu6j7U6MNdDaZSY ocOITb+RiKbaRUck2tkO12qCLIpFFyi3b/412Zx8WS2VhgOrjgmD+3hEf/bClZxAVWzg VXag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3k+w0jZccnlMXkvqq3+FsKpY5p7DWI3VJ1bkRrPRCFivSaNuXuFl54+bhmED+zLw==
X-Received: by 10.107.135.136 with SMTP id r8mr5728744ioi.36.1489594609564; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b126sm1666577ioa.55.2017.03.15.09.16.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
To: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <37ED3E78-B23A-4D29-8597-5A63236129B1@cisco.com>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <887bd0f0-32a5-56f1-9ac9-703ecb97a760@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 05:16:55 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <37ED3E78-B23A-4D29-8597-5A63236129B1@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/bCkiuXtQTiKhYlYZMhr1AJtvoJw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:16:57 -0000

Stefano,
On 16/03/2017 04:55, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
...
> In the mean time, I think it is way too premature to come to conclusion on what text should be used for RFC2460bis and I recommend that the current text is left unchanged until we figured out what to do with EH insertion.

I believe that we have figured it out: extension header insertion is harmful to Internet interoperability.

I fully agree with Suresh's understanding of the rough consensus.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email