RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation

JJB, I'm reading that draft link you just sent out in response to IGP avoidance in multi-router HNs. I for one would like to avoid icky/sticky RIP'y or a heavier IGP if we can at all avoid it.

-KE 

________________________________

From: John Jason Brzozowski [mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: Thu 7/30/2009 9:20 AM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson; IETF IPv6 Mailing List
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router@tools.ietf.org; draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation

> From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
> Organization: People's Front Against WWW
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:21:50 -0400
> To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Cc: <draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router@tools.ietf.org>,
> <draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs@tools.ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>> Um, what does a router do? Look at the example in the text and ask
>> yourself if you want an average user (my canonical "average user" being
>> my daughter, who wanted me to come to her house to install a camera on
>> her computer so she could use it on Skype - "did you try plugging it
>> in?") manually installing routes in each of the four routers when they
>> could in fact learn them from each other directly?
>
> So, looking at this from another angle, namely deployment. I'm a router
> engineer, I support the use of routing protocols as much as the next
> router engineer, but I think a good question to ask is whether most home
> CPE vendors think RIP for IPv6 is hard to implement, or if this is
> something they consider easy?
[jjmb] implementation difficulty is important as is making sure the
underlying hardware can support it.  Also we may be ok with a routing
protocol but what about someone who is not a router engineer?  Will it be
straightforward enough for everyone else to setup?
>
> If it's easy to implement RIP for IPv6 then I'm a proponent for that
> model.
>
> Fred, (just checking) the model you're advocating then is that DHCPv6-PD
> from the main home CPE (with WAN connection) hands out subnets which are
> then announced to all home gateways via RIP(v6) ?
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any
copy of this E-mail and any printout.