Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB028C2A2 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.105
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pT8vn70kXa2D for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com (paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com [208.17.35.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C5228C2DC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.195.246.152]) by paoakoavas09.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id KP-NTF18.75943250; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:28:57 -0400
Received: from NJCHLEXCMB01.cable.comcast.com ([172.24.2.44]) by NJMDCEXCRLY01.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:28:58 -0400
Received: from 198.137.252.126 ([198.137.252.126]) by NJCHLEXCMB01.cable.comcast.com ([172.24.2.44]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.comcast.com ([198.137.252.76]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:28:58 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:28:56 +0200
Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
From: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <C69796E8.B20F7%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation
Thread-Index: AcoRMKwFZaa+wV8VSEuzi3aQ8WaamwAAilk8
In-Reply-To: <CC5692AD-FB0F-44BD-A1EE-AAF4602E8D8B@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2009 16:28:58.0870 (UTC) FILETIME=[D71FC160:01CA1132]
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router@tools.ietf.org, draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs@tools.ietf.org, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:30:07 -0000
It was in reply to an earlier comment. This is the extent of its relevance. > From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:12:55 -0400 > To: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> > Cc: "Stark, Barbara" <bs7652@att.com>, "Azinger, Marla" > <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>, > <draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router@tools.ietf.org>, > <draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs@tools.ietf.org>, IETF IPv6 > Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation > > > > On Jul 30, 2009, at 5:10 PM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > >> It enables route injection into a provider network absent the need >> for a >> dynamic routing protocol. > > and what in this discussion is relevant to the provider network? > > Everything I am talking about is inside the user's home.
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Erichsen, Kirk
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Azinger, Marla
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Azinger, Marla
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Azinger, Marla
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Azinger, Marla
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Stark, Barbara
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Ole Troan
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Ole Troan
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Ole Troan
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Yiu L. Lee
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Jason.Weil
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Yiu L. Lee
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- RE: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Erichsen, Kirk
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Fred Baker
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation John Jason Brzozowski
- Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation Aleksi Suhonen