Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing Header encapsulation for Alternate Marking Method
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 19 February 2023 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1103BC151544; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:25:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABHaFDHxhiJc; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4051FC151542; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2f.google.com with SMTP id 18so950094vkn.9; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:24:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UjOV1b7JkNxhdEg2kZGvIPn6qOzJ73ZjVbU3VtYvjdM=; b=URUDQcOeiYsTicxnbhG0bzfB2qEQwuMkZTcC6NCGcHa2rFiY1BbiJ2ALJAlrIi3MLA eknGGyu41TDpm3n5bqbwMAGPKL8lrGBokDINPLYGlmjBPMyxHYYw8M6zIsUQi3syopZ9 P0OTCjYWzdwBcvzaYEnS85jhAQeombbagj/6qB9cJxDDvWuoZvvWoMLxtVaxdTodTqgE muUb69cIHBiB66mIYxiUZSSaeGD4zfsJHkvSzvpSvONkdJU+QkMgsIxrgXlS2+srD8mL Qxcnm58+m8/tLA7WnfQo8ePVm9ja0DUte7doHtelRWhLkW3hNQwESbr4S/3E70jS+kbi 2JWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UjOV1b7JkNxhdEg2kZGvIPn6qOzJ73ZjVbU3VtYvjdM=; b=Cb+d8EZhPcWWT5sRmVUw/HTQphaExlDWONADbktNXUDfGb1sfL2OXX1+y4qqjEiCXh UDpE3a6SxpwEgblMnC3sWC2R0p094X8zFNPUbkQSccI0MxSda7fVQjSfSN3sw4w05Oue ROFxK6TltRFuyA6ri+ypUxmZ9cO2vtaRG0HmmfCiIutTn/HuESuv6t6djbkVTs0g4+3K hvGM/wEISkIZIqy3YLBPOnOhhKSyKtBuH8CN0PqmYlQtsDlecY/gUdYTwjW1riArT6+G ZaGfo5fcyFZ4SlgAk9cXY6g+fbDPiS0rLmzSee1evsChg8/HRF+Hm+whBmA6OqqUHFx2 dFdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUz980QB1cAPGysEb0FK9q0CSH0iwarsxHQb0wHe6jjlS4mSyvU S7dBYhKlXeuzMIChEzBwKZ3T67Yro9i6nsdvesN2g7fO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+5PNdeV0VuAxI5zLELOAm6Z0A5/6vVVkGHzVaoO2r3ifK0tH9MDj36arqekR/igU3AS1Hi3AbfOedNUDy7Yuc=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2402:0:b0:3b7:5ff7:cfb8 with SMTP id k2-20020a1f2402000000b003b75ff7cfb8mr153150vkk.11.1676827495948; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 09:24:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c51e4a3f-5e6e-5386-4e6a-23709d52c1fe@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <c51e4a3f-5e6e-5386-4e6a-23709d52c1fe@joelhalpern.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:54:19 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6NxjfXm19rPQDcMkT0gbk9_nsB5b=M=aFeXTbVxdb-TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003ee63005f510d30a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/l8xKNm2a_yuP2-VDzohP2Ax6i4w>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing Header encapsulation for Alternate Marking Method
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 17:25:01 -0000
Hi Joel, I support adoption of this document. I also feel that the motivation of why use SRH AltMark TLV needs to be made explicit early on in the document. Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 6:14 AM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > This call is for the draft at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark > > This email starts the WG adoption call for the subject draft (as > requested by the authors, with apologies from the WG chairs for how long > it has taken to kick this out.) This call will run through the end of > the day on Feb 16. Pleaes read the whole email as there are a few > points, and it is not that long. > > Please comment on whether you think this topic is something you think > the spring WG should work, whether you think this draft is a good > starting point for such work, any issues or concerns you have, and > whether you would be willing to help be contributing and / or reviewing > the work if the WG does choose to work on it. > > 6man is copied for their information, as this is different from but > related to an extension header proposal in front of 6man. > > Authors and named contributors, please confirm to the list that all > known, relevant, IPR has been disclosed. If it has note, please remedy > this gap. > > The spring chairs have noted one aspect of this draft that caught our > eye, and we would appreciate WG members who comment on the adoption to > consider, and if possible opine, on this. As we read this draft, as > distinct from the related 6man extension header work, this causes the > recorded altmarks to only be updated at routers identified in the SRH > segment list. (We presume this would include all identified points in a > compressed container.) We could not tell from the document what the > value was for this as distinct from getting the measurements at all > routers. Do WG members understand and agree that it does have value? > > As a lesser point, we consider that one quote in the draft is misleading > and will likely need to be reworded in the near future. The draft say > "SRH TLV can also be used to encode the AltMark Data Fields for SRv6 and > to monitor every node along the SR path." It is unclear if these was > intended to mean all routers (most of which would not see this TLV) or > if it was intended to refer to only those routers identified in the SRH, > in which case we presume it will be reworded. > > Thank you, > > Joel > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing Heade… Joel Halpern
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Haoyu Song
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Cheng Li
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Mauro Cociglio
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … xiao.min2
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Haoyu Song
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… 庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … xiao.min2
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Xuewei Wang
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Aijun Wang
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Nilo Massimo
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Tianran Zhou
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Tianran Zhou
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [IPv6] [spring] WG Adoption call for Segment … Joel Halpern
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… bruno.decraene
- Re: [IPv6] WG Adoption call for Segment Routing H… Giuseppe Fioccola