IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-02.txt

<michael.dillon@bt.com> Tue, 24 July 2007 08:58 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDGDn-0008TP-9d; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:58:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDGDk-0008T7-U5 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:58:20 -0400
Received: from smtp5.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.139]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDGDk-0000xN-DD for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:58:20 -0400
Received: from E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.114]) by smtp5.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:58:19 +0100
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:58:06 +0100
Message-ID: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0BF872D@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707240838150.13685@chandra.student.uit.no>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-02.txt
Thread-Index: AcfNvXlFXS84InK0SIqRYsQ9EfmpRQAEsEAg
References: <200706251556.l5PFu6Qa057410@mail.reprise.com><078201c7bdb0$503f2dc0$543816ac@atlanta.polycom.com><94065E4E-7A57-46AC-8A13-D7591C26EA13@apple.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101337220.9923@chandra.student.uit.no><FEB5791F-8495-4905-8D6C-D454F46FD976@apple.com><22851.1184090216@sa.vix.com><B29043A9-6165-47FB-B83A-0A5272A0C451@apple.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.0707111133400.9923@chandra.student.uit.no><D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0AA2CAA@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net><28681.1184163817@sa.vix.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707240838150.13685@chandra.student.uit.no>
From: michael.dillon@bt.com
To: ipv6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2007 08:58:19.0789 (UTC) FILETIME=[C821ABD0:01C7CDD0]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

> so what has happen to this? Still no feedback from authors or 
> chairs or?

The WG chairs have asked the authors of the draft to review and edit it
because there is not currently consensus on ULA-C. If those authors are
smart, they will work with Vixie and incorporate some of the comments
from this list as well. Once they have finished editing, they will
submit a new draft and we will have something to comment on.

Or they may simply go away having given up on finding consensus. In that
case, Vixie's draft is still in play I believe.

I suggest that you contact the authors directly if you have some
concerns. Not all work occurs on the list.

--Michael Dillon

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email