IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 06 December 2010 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEB73A6893 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:08:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id al+Gwdxesktm for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F783A6806 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id fvKb1f00F0ldTLk57x9zLt; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:09:59 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-70-245-227.cisco.com ([171.70.245.227]) by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id fx9X1f00T4v61nP3Qx9eFY; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:09:54 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <4CFD4E2F.6040601@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:09:29 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B03DF5BE-7342-4A78-BE41-F0738F1CE2EC@tony.li>
References: <C9F49613-1F78-484A-B7D3-7E4028E0B9C3@castlepoint.net> <AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520CBA0665@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com> <2EEE5586-CD41-4C13-8D13-FC69ED126A1F@castlepoint.net> <AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520CBA0737@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com> <309BCE56-9213-4B29-A364-B3421D952080@castlepoint.net> <4CFD4AC6.7090706@cisco.com> <975530EB-90F0-4FFA-AA5A-E1FBA7160439@tony.li> <4CFD4E2F.6040601@cisco.com>
To: raszuk@cisco.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:08:35 -0000

> So while we are at ISIS WG I would not mind if we would just run a new instance purely for network wide config making each router to be an NMS station. Call it C-ISIS. Example: instead of configuring links on the adjacent nodes configure link parameter anywhere, instead of configuring node at a node .. configure it anywhere.


Somehow, cramming the NMS into the routing protocol seems like the worst of all worlds.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email