IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01

<bruno.decraene@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 07 December 2010 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976963A692E for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:42:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6R-e9QO2CCm for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3E43A68C4 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 66FB38B8004 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:44:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289B8B8003 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:44:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:43:41 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:43:47 +0100
Message-ID: <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC24001BDAE10@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012070718430.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01
Thread-Index: AcuV2DZ6cVxNYH3CSNS68JmiaHijqAADvfIA
References: <C9F49613-1F78-484A-B7D3-7E4028E0B9C3@castlepoint.net><AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520CBA0665@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com><2EEE5586-CD41-4C13-8D13-FC69ED126A1F@castlepoint.net><AE36820147909644AD2A7CA014B1FB520CBA0737@xmb-sjc-222.amer.cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012070718430.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: bruno.decraene@orange-ftgroup.com
To: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2010 08:43:41.0812 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9BD0340:01CB95EA]
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:42:18 -0000

[Warning: thinking out loud...]

a) I understand the need to cost out a link with a single CLI on a
single router.
b) I hear that some would prefer management action be done with
management protocols rather than routing protocols extensions.

So what about doing (a) with management protocols? i.e. a router A
providing a single CLI and triggering the remote action on router B
using management protocols.
That would also serve as a test to see by ourselves if this is
convenient or if those management protocols need enhancement. It could
also be reused as an example for NMS to do it by themselves next (next?)
time.

Regards,
Bruno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email